Wikipedia Sucks!
https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/

Sanger wants Everipedia to be a post-truth Wikipedia
https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1175
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Graaf Statler [ Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:52 am ]
Post subject:  Sanger wants Everipedia to be a post-truth Wikipedia

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... =6&t=10290

I absolute don't like the personal attacks about peoples motivations and I have understand Larry still receives royalties for his idee Wikipedia. That was written on Jimmytalk not long ago.

Everipedia.

Both Dysk and I had a try because the proof of the pudding is in the eating. My conclusion is the it contain the same system errors as Wikipedia.

A one size fits all global approach, no respect for local laws and regulation, no hierarchy of experts, focus on (there crypto) money.

Crypto money is just another form of money. First we used shells and salt, later gold and silver, and later banknotes and storage in silicon. But the basic principes remains the same, there must be a underlying value.
And that underlying value can never be copylefted knowledge or algoritmes, because if you do so you create a new tulip trade. There must be something what is your underlying value. Something what is created, no matter if it is a car, a song, or patatos. The underlying value must be something people want to have, no matter if it is sex, food, a good time or a yacht. Or a villa, song or a good computer program. Legal. Nobody pay good money for a illegal build house or a illegal clone of a computerprogram.

Crypto money doesn't change anything of the normal economic principes. The Euro is a very strong currency, and in the same time one of the most shitty currency on earth. But why keep it its value? Because of the underlying economies. And of course you can connect the name Elon Musk to the Bitcoin, but still it is just a algorithm without any underlying value, in short it is a tulip bulb. Just like the Everipedia Tokens are.

So, there is still no reward for the editors, one of the biggest system errors of wikipedia. The free loaders looking for the free lunches get the powered and the honour and the money.

Here for instance. A extreem example.

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... asmusprijs.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_W ... asmusprijs

Author:  Graaf Statler [ Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Sanger wants Everipedia to be a post-truth Wikipedia

https://genderdesk.wordpress.com/2019/04/15/death-taxes-and-cryptocurrency/

Here you are.....

Did you sell or trade any crypto money? You need to inform the taxes.
It is just a good, like a house, shares. Only without underlying value.

https://cryptocurrencyfacts.com/the-basics-of-cryptocurrencies-and-taxes/

"Cyptocurrency can only be a stable value with a underlying value. "Knowledge" what ever that might be can be, if it has any value itself. Gathered and stolen, illegal "knowledge" or algorithms can never be a stable underlining value, in that case it is tulip bulb trade, tulip mania (Dutch: tulpenmanie)".

Again a law of Statler.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/