View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:45 pm




Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Lets put it all in it's perspective. 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 2789
Reply with quote
Midsize Jack wrote:
in the thread, I suggested that the joe-jobbery is being done to try to prejudice the judge in Mr. Abd's case against him, given that most judges know how to use Google and might well try to research upcoming defendants with it, if only to save themselves some time.

Correct. And the lawyer of WMF too.

The Facts:

*Both Lomax and I consider mentioning our name on a list what is a mix of innocent users and people who have done very bad thinks as deformation, special because MWF has published the list under a CC licences. And because it is easy to connect it to our real identity.
*Both we don't object against the ban itself, but if it was fair is up to the court.
*I myself have other objections too like still using my work without my permission and allowing to spread my private info in there infrastructure. And deformation by other people and insulting in general. And I have asked Mr. Ausma to monitor this whole matter. So far my part.

*Lomax has started a law case. And as I have said many, many times before we know the result of this law case only after the verdict and not one minute before. Stare downs are complete useless, non of the party's will show even a corner of his cards. They hold them to there chest, WMF too.
*IF the judge decided she has questions for me is that a practical matter to solve and a matter between the Judge, me, my lawyer, the lawyer of WMF and Lomax and of no one else and for sure not of Vigilant! And notice I write IF!

That is the situation for now and the best thing for outsiders is to stay out of it from now on. It is Lomax his law cause against the Wikimedia foundation for a American court and the judge is speaking now and no one else. The judge is the one who decides what happens, and no one else. And if she wants more information for sure she will ask for it.

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Thu May 16, 2019 1:32 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 2789
Reply with quote
Well, Vig, as said leave the case in the hands of the judge, ok? And the defence in the capable hands of the laywer of WMF.
Seen his qualifications I don't think he need the "legal advices" of some complete flipped computer nerd, don't you think?

And only France a real country in Europe, Vig? Did you know Holland is the second most succesfull country after Switzerland in the world? Noting wrong about France of course, but believe me Holland is one of the most inventive and riches country's in the world! And don't let the Germans hear you! One of the biggest and richest industrial country's in the world.

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Thu May 16, 2019 3:48 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 2789
Reply with quote
Timmytim wrote:
Dunno, freedom of panorama comes into play there. It's not like every person ever appearing in any photo taken anywhere for any purpose has to sign release forms before it can be published.

Mr. Stapler probably likes this idea a lot though.

Naw, no. Not interested in this suggestion. I have a much better legal poisson. I putted a few photo's from which i own the rights on commons in the past and have forbidden WMF to use them anymore. I have withdrawn the license from all my work on the WMF products, and they still use it. Several times I have ordered them to remove it and also I have informed the lawyer of the chapter about this. So they can't denier.

A judge will be for sure be deleted about the child porn, copyright infringement and for sure agree with me I don't want my pictures in such a place published, don't you think? And even without my permision! Give me one, one argument WMF still have the right to use my pictures and to give them free even for commercial use. One agreement, one value legal argument.

Why should WMF have the right to use and to capitalise the work of a user they have defamed? Much better than RoundUp! Because there is not one single valuable argument and it is now copyvio In the tricky Dutch legal system. And the articles I wrote too.
Congrad's, highly professional legal team of WMF!

My pictures

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Fri May 17, 2019 3:14 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 2789
Reply with quote
You was so desperate curious to see a few corners of my cards, Vig?
Well, here you are and this all I show!, so more phishing is useless.

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Fri May 17, 2019 3:39 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group ColorizeIt.
Designed by ST Software.