Midsize Jack wrote: in the thread, I suggested that the joe-jobbery is being done to try to prejudice the judge in Mr. Abd's case against him, given that most judges know how to use Google and might well try to research upcoming defendants with it, if only to save themselves some time.
Correct. And the lawyer of WMF too.
The Facts:
*Both Lomax and I consider mentioning our name on a list what is a mix of innocent users and people who have done very bad thinks as deformation, special because MWF has published the list under a CC licences. And because it is easy to connect it to our real identity.
*Both we don't object against the ban itself, but if it was fair is up to the court.
*I myself have other objections too like still using my work without my permission and allowing to spread my private info in there infrastructure. And deformation by other people and insulting in general. And I have asked Mr. Ausma to monitor this whole matter. So far my part.
*Lomax has started a law case. And as I have said many, many times before we know the result of this law case only after the verdict and not one minute before. Stare downs are complete useless, non of the party's will show even a corner of his cards. They hold them to there chest, WMF too.
*IF the judge decided she has questions for me is that a practical matter to solve and a matter between the Judge, me, my lawyer, the lawyer of WMF and Lomax and of no one else and for sure not of Vigilant! And notice I write IF!
That is the situation for now and the best thing for outsiders is to stay out of it from now on. It is Lomax his law cause against the Wikimedia foundation for a American court and the judge is speaking now and no one else. The judge is the one who decides what happens, and no one else. And if she wants more information for sure she will ask for it.