Wikipedia Critics: an Intellectual Analysis

[Anyone]

And here's the latest summary.

Revisions pertain mainly to our first class passengers [ie, Senior Critics], though I've also tweaked the middle order so that Auggie is now above Eric Corbett. Ratings for steerage passengers [ie, Junior Critics] are pretty much as before.

Senior Critics

Larry Sanger
RATING 9.5/10

Gregory Kohs
RATING 9/10

Andreas Kolbe
RATING 8.5/10

Daniel Brandt
RATING 8/10

TDA
RATING 8/10

Eric Barbour
RATING 8/10

Peter Damian
RATING 7.5/10


Mid-level Critics

Auggie
RATING 6.5/10

Eric Corbett
RATING 6/10

Carrite
RATING 6/10

Sashi / Bezdomi
RATING 6/10

Casliber
RATING 5/10

Mr Lomax
RATING 5/10

Dysklyver
RATING 5/10

Beeblebrox
RATING 4.5/10


Junior Critics

Kumioko
RATING 4/10

Ritchie333
RATING 4/10

Vigilant
RATING 4/10

CrowsNest
RATING 4/10

Jake
RATING 3.5/10

Tarantino
RATING 3/10

Ming
RATING 3/10

Graaf Statler
RATING 2.5/10

Poetlister
RATING 2/10

[sashi]

It's a point of some distinction to work so hard under the bridge for two meager dark-side cookies... will you tackle all the saints at genderdesk, oh one-ish one, or are you done?

[Murubima]

Anyone said:

What is it, then, that makes you think he's some sort of critic?

I was thinking about things such as his coining phrases like 'Wikipedia without content is just Facebook for ugly people', his stance against TFA and his objections to the overall appearance of the Main page. Sorry, I know that's all a bit random.

[CrowsNest]

Clean this thread up properly Juice. Make it look like you're being a mod, not just covering your ass.

[JuiceBeetle]

CrowsNest: there's nothing to cover up, and this thread is good as it is. Psyops see the moderation log, and read your rants that I moved.

When I moved your rants topic to the daylight, where everybody can see, then there was swift opposition, so it's now back in the shadows.
Unfortunately Madam Gender does not see your moved posts, as a result. You can tell her a story of your "criticism" being removed, but in fact only your rants and abuses are moved.

The difficulty with this system is when your posts contain criticism intermixed with abusive language. On a few occasions I found your criticism so valuable, that I spent considerable time to separate the unwanted rants into another post that I moved. Please value the time I invest into this.
If I deemed some of your criticism a rant, yet you find it important, then please rephrase and post it again.

[CrowsNest]

Just stop lying.

Nobody believes you except the people desperate to lick your ring and be part of the new and improved Wikipediocracy 2.0 you're busy creating.

It is not a rant to point out that you have not removed posts from this thread that are not on topic, you have only removed my criticism of how you moderate. Just one of the lies you are telling, about this one single issue. Multiply it across multiple issues, and that's why I could give less of a shit how much time you waste trying to cover your own ass.

[CrowsNest]

Have your masters undelete every post you deleted from this thread.

Show everyone your willingness to invest in me (what a fuckjng joke!)

Let the people know what you're doing.

[CrowsNest]

please rephrase and post it again.

Rephrase this.....

ME. BITE.

[JuiceBeetle]

Rephrase this.....
ME. BITE.

YOU. ZOMBIE.
Your rants above will be moved to your "hidden" topic.
This should not stop you from ranting and complaining. /sarc

[CrowsNest]

Well if you don't learn the difference between a rant and a criticism, you better clear your diary for the next month at least.