Questioning Wikipedia's innovation-killing evasion policy.

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
User avatar
CMAwatch
Sucks Critic
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: What matters more?

Post by CMAwatch » Sat Nov 16, 2019 10:31 pm

Abd wrote:
CMAwatch wrote:Bbb23 needs to go.
This is the language of disempowerment. By pretending that "need" exists in the disliked object, one avoids responsibility. Who has the "need" and what is real about it?

It has already been documented by the community and in the main Bbb23 thread, and soon on WikiTop.cc.

Abd wrote:Then, what is possible? "Bbb23 gone" is not particularly inspiring.


I am open to anyone's suggestions.

Abd wrote:Someone else would be found to fill the role, that's how structure on this scale works. The lack of clear specificity perpetuates the disempowerment, in which a persistent complainer can feel that he or she is confronting "bad behavior," without having any responsibility for outcome.

We learned as children that if we complained enough, someone, generally our parents, would give in. It worked. And even when it stops working, we continue the behavior, this is all well-known human psychology. So what is possible and what, if anything, stops us from doing it?


But the complaints of the community are based on actual logic.

Bbb23 is actively harming Wikipedia, evidently.
Thus, he needs to be removed.

I just wonder how exactly we are going to get rid of him.

Also, if possible, recover Aron Manning and Handroid7 for the reasons mentioned in the original post.

Handroid7's draft pages were very good, and Bbb23 just decided to destroy everything, destroy legitimate redirects and behave utterly disrespectful to him. Disgustingly suppressive.
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am
[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.

User avatar
CMAwatch
Sucks Critic
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Accurate movie.

Post by CMAwatch » Wed Nov 27, 2019 6:37 pm

Side note: Finally, the forums are back online. That upgrade took a while, but it was well worth it! The last forum software was antique and unintuitive.

This is Wikipedia, especially their ban evasion policy:



Bbb23 is a person with no dignity, no mercy, no logic and ultimate an innovation killer.

Mankind needs to be liberated from apocalyptic innovation killers like him.


Handroid7 worked towards Wikipedia's goals.
Bbb23 works against Wikipedia's goals.
Who should be blocked, logically?

Also, Chanc20190325's few anti-circumcision edits are pretty much nothing compared to Bbb23's cyber-massacre and digital carnage.

The administrators should have embraced Handroid7's work, and even unblocked his other account on sight.
But no, their confirmation bias and anti-innovative practices prevent Wikipedia from getting better.
Instead, cyber-sociopath Bbb23 mercilessly shredded all of Handroid7's good work, and revoked his talk page access for no reason.

Handroid7's account creation after his previous account was blocked has inflicted exactly zero logical damage to Wikipedia, and made it even better, while Bbb23 is busy causing cyber-carnages.

The misanthrope Bbb23 even evidently repeatedly reverts edits without actually checking their contents, which is vandalism, and unacceptable for an administrator.

Apparently, who (who wrote it) matters more to Bbb23 than what (the contents).
Isn't Wikipedia a collaborative project?

According to Bbb23's actions, it isn't. #BbbGate
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am
[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.

User avatar
CMAwatch
Sucks Critic
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Questioning Wikipedia's innovation-killing evasion polic

Post by CMAwatch » Sun Dec 01, 2019 9:48 pm

He is still alive!

Interesting read by Handroid7.

Even mentions Bbb23.
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am
[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.

User avatar
CMAwatch
Sucks Critic
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Automatic unblock

Post by CMAwatch » Fri Dec 06, 2019 9:14 pm

If Wikipedia's policies were more ideal, they would actually behave oppositely when spotting a ban evader who makes actual good contributions:

If the ban evader has not repeated his original mistakes, he has automatically proven that he knows better now, therefore his original account should be unblocked automatically.

E.g. Bbb23 should have unblocked Chanc20190325 instead of blocking Handroid7, because he has never repeated the original mistake (anti-circumcision editing) on his new account, proving that he is perfectly innocent now.

TL;DR: Be constructive, not destructive!
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am
[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.

Post Reply