WT.Social
-
- Side Troll
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
Re: WT.Social
suckadmin wrote:I wonder how long a criticism group on WT.Social would last.. lol
I've posted a Wikiped criticism article (diversity, harassment - accepted criticism topic) and it stayed. Haven't seen censorship so far and there are not many wikipedians, so I don't expect Jimbo to whitewash WP. The community seems open to WP's dark side, it just has to be in the form of an article.
-
- Side Troll
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: WT.Social
Yes, seems to be very important according to Abd. My training this, my training that, you don't understand anything because you are not trained and still in in your childhood. Abdism. And I was just wondering, are you ever trained?
-
- Janitor
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:56 pm
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: WT.Social
Graaf Statler wrote:Yes, seems to be very important according to Abd. My training this, my training that, you don't understand anything because you are not trained and still in in your childhood. Abdism. And I was just wondering, are you ever trained?
Do you even lift bro?
-
- Side Troll
- Posts: 3996
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1373 times
- Been thanked: 2116 times
Re: WT.Social
I would verbally abuse WT.Social, but since I categorically refuse to give Jimbo $$$ to access it....might as well be one of the WMF private IRC channels. Idiots spewing Wiki-Luv at each other--when they're not plotting to destroy someone.
-
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:27 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 45 times
Re: WT.Social
ericbarbour wrote:I categorically refuse to give Jimbo $$$ to access it
Don't need to. Without donation, it takes half to one hour before an account is activated.
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1373 times
- Been thanked: 2116 times
Re: WT.Social
https://news.slashdot.org/story/19/11/3 ... edium=feed
Back to calling the little shit "Sole Founder" of Wikipedia.
They now "claim to have" 345,000 users. The number of PAYING users is not specified. I would bet it's a very small percentage.
And this thread is kind of hilarious.
Back to calling the little shit "Sole Founder" of Wikipedia.
They now "claim to have" 345,000 users. The number of PAYING users is not specified. I would bet it's a very small percentage.
And this thread is kind of hilarious.
Re:Already Leftist (Score:3)
by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Saturday November 30, 2019 @01:28PM (#59470958)
“Everyone is welcome, but I'd like to make a special call for women, LGBTQIA, and non-white folks. You are under-represented in online moderation, and as such online moderation does not protect you as it should. Let's change that, together...”
What bothers you about this statement? It's accurate. It seems to be quite reasonable.
Re:Already Leftist (Score:2)
by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Saturday November 30, 2019 @01:33PM (#59470968)
The words that you strung together don't make any sense in this context.
Re:Already Leftist (Score:1)
by 110010001000 ( 697113 ) on Saturday November 30, 2019 @01:38PM (#59470980) Homepage Journal
Let me spell it out for you: the email contained racist language. It specially called for extra consideration based on SKIN COLOR. This is insane. What does skin color have to do with "online moderation"? Does skin pigment cause people to moderate online a certain way? What shade of skin color do we have to be answer this "special call", how much pigmentation do we need? The whole SJW nonsense is completely insane and inane. Skin color doesn't make you think a certain way, or perceive the world in a certain way. Also, it doesn't matter who you fuck, so the whole LGBTQIA is equally stupid. Just because you fuck a certain type of person doesn't make you think a certain way.
Re:Already Leftist (Score:3, Insightful)
by DogDude ( 805747 ) on Saturday November 30, 2019 @01:41PM (#59470996)
Oh, I see, You don't understand society or history at all.
In the US, racism is a big problem, and has been for a long time. As a result, people who are discriminated against as a group are at many disadvantages in our society. Encouraging discriminated against groups to hold positions of power helps those groups of people by making their viewpoint known.
Re:
Fuck the US. What does this have to do with the US? This is global. Is the US the only racist country you can think of? And what does this have to do with racism? Are white people planning on modding down non-white people? Do white people all over the world band together and oppress non-whites? It is complete nonsense. White people in the US don't think alike, and they don't think like white French people, or white Russian people, or pink people from Mars. You fucking SJWs are trying to destroy society. So
Re:
Are white people planning on modding down non-white people?
White people's views and values are the most prevalent, yes.
Re:Already Leftist (Score:4, Insightful)
by 110010001000 ( 697113 ) on Saturday November 30, 2019 @01:59PM (#59471066) Homepage Journal
Aha, so here is the crux of your claim. Your claim is that white people have certain common "views and values". And presumably non-whites have different "views and values".That is wrong and that is what makes you SJWs disgusting creatures and racists. We are all individuals. You think just because a person has certain skin pigmentation, or chooses to fuck a particular type of person they must have things in "common". Guess what? We don't.