One of the better articles about the facts of monkey selfie. From Wikipedia to PETA.
People may be astonished when I say that Wikipedia are not interested in facts or expert sources of information. They will soon be beating their own chest again in an effort to destroy the facts of my story in order to justify their own crimes. This is my experience and my truth.
Wikipedia are the real villains here. Wikipedia are creating a post-fact world in favor of bigger (and financially motivated) agendas. They don;t care about monkeys or photographers wanting to save the animals. Science is suffering because facts often don't agree with policy. Wikipedia's mission is to create "alternative" facts. Heard this before? I will be exposing more on this in the future.
IFLScience is a great site for amazing stories about science and our world. If you want facts and theories written in a fun way, please take a look: http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/meet-the-man-who-is-being-sued-by-a-monkey/all/
Slater has a long and arduous legal path to get to Wikipedia for its theft of the monkey selfie. If he sues in Britain it'd be easier for him and he could possibly sue Jimbo Wales who has some money.