Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
Post Reply
User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Admin
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 510 times
Been thanked: 224 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by boredbird » Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:13 am

SkepticalHistorian wrote:
Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:03 am
Put a little love in your heart❣️🎶(and the world will be a better place)
A Nazi who preaches universal love! That's really special. You're really special.

Let's see, the Holocaust didn't happen and it was fully justified. Do I have that right "Raquel"?

Love? Okay, I love how you say that Jews shouldn't be able to live in other countries but also they don't deserve their own country either. Hmm, what is the solution? Something which didn't happen, right?

I wonder what your hero Adolf would have had to say about you, cupcake.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 1370 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:06 pm

SkepticalHistorian wrote:
Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:03 am
Criminal harassment, mentioned in my post, read what VM and Priotrus wrote?
We did. They rant, you rant, it's tiresome to read.
Are you related to Icewhiz?
No he's not. I vouch for him.

And answer the fucking question.

You are skating on thin ice. It's America, First Amendment, you have the right to moan about Jews all you want. But I'd prefer not to see it on this forum BECAUSE IT'S FOR WIKIPEDIA CRITICISM. And I personally don't buy any part of the Holocaust-denial "biz". Throughout history ALL people have been rotten to each other at one time or another. It's a poor justification for bringing your obsession with "Holocaust fakery" crap and waving it around.

If you're looking for "emotional support", you know where Stormfront is.

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Fan
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by Ognistysztorm » Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:10 am

Case has been officially opened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _in_Poland

An editor claimed that the page "Naliboki massacre" has been fixed.

Cla68 here's a question, would the worst case scenario as you had elaborated earlier still apply if let's say, all the pages have been successfully fixed by those like the editor, but no appropriate safeguards are enacted to prevent that kind from happening in the future?
Last edited by Ognistysztorm on Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

SkepticalHistorian
Sucks Fan
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon May 10, 2021 4:00 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by SkepticalHistorian » Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:11 am

boredbird wrote:
Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:13 am
SkepticalHistorian wrote:
Mon Mar 13, 2023 3:03 am
Put a little love in your heart❣️🎶(and the world will be a better place)
A Nazi who preaches universal love! That's really special. You're really special.
I’m not a Nazi, I’m communist. Communist aristocracy is the solution.

User avatar
Cla68
Sucks
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2020 7:18 pm
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 76 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by Cla68 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 7:53 pm

Ognistysztorm wrote:
Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:10 am
Case has been officially opened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _in_Poland

An editor claimed that the page "Naliboki massacre" has been fixed.

Cla68 here's a question, would the worst case scenario as you had elaborated earlier still apply if let's say, all the pages have been successfully fixed by those like the editor, but no appropriate safeguards are enacted to prevent that kind from happening in the future?
If the articles get "fixed" then the doomsday scenario probably won't happen. Grabowski and friends appear willing and able to chain themselves to their Wikipedia watchlists for the rest of their lives to make sure the information never gets changed again.

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Fan
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by Ognistysztorm » Sun Mar 19, 2023 9:19 pm

Cla68 wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 7:53 pm
Ognistysztorm wrote:
Tue Mar 14, 2023 3:10 am
Case has been officially opened:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _in_Poland

An editor claimed that the page "Naliboki massacre" has been fixed.

Cla68 here's a question, would the worst case scenario as you had elaborated earlier still apply if let's say, all the pages have been successfully fixed by those like the editor, but no appropriate safeguards are enacted to prevent that kind from happening in the future?
If the articles get "fixed" then the doomsday scenario probably won't happen. Grabowski and friends appear willing and able to chain themselves to their Wikipedia watchlists for the rest of their lives to make sure the information never gets changed again.
Here's wondering how large of a chance of them fucking up over this again and result in the doomsday scenario as you described. Actually I believe that Wikipedia should be allowed to fail this time and be replaced by a multitude of competitor platforms. Perhaps it could happen if Justapedia is launched mere days from now and somehow cause a critical mass of editors to move over there.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 1370 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by ericbarbour » Sun Mar 19, 2023 10:01 pm

Perhaps it could happen if Justapedia is launched mere days from now and somehow cause a critical mass of editors to move over there.
Please don't make me laugh. So long as WP keeps its fanatical cult going, no one will successfully challenge it.

I've added this stuff to the book wiki--stupid as it is, it's exactly what the book wiki is intended for.

Did anyone ever find out or keep track of which en-WP accounts Grabowski was using? I've seen it claimed that he was editing in the Polish article area before.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Admin
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 510 times
Been thanked: 224 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by boredbird » Sun Mar 19, 2023 10:56 pm

K.e.coffman's evidence against GizzyCatBella is worth reading.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... .e.coffman
GizzyCatBella wrote: Mark-Paul is one of the greatest Polish-Canadian historian dedicated to this particular topic, accepted by virtually every relevant gate of interest.
Grabowski & Klein wrote: Another absurd source legitimized by the distortionist group is Mark Paul. This author appears to be a legitimate historian at first glance, with relevant publications in Holocaust history. In fact, ‘Mark Paul’ does not exist, a fact known to every scholar familiar with the historiography on the Holocaust in Poland; it is the pseudonym of an author–perhaps several authors–who pens lengthy online documents riddled with anti-semitic clichés and stereotypes.
Must use Glaukopis because Icewhiz.
GizzyCatBella wrote: Icewhiz's intent was to make Glaukopis unrealible for Wikipiedia. That's what Icewhiz always wanted, because scholars who publish in Glaukopis don't accommodate Icewhiz's POV.

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Fan
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by Ognistysztorm » Mon Mar 20, 2023 12:43 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 10:01 pm
Perhaps it could happen if Justapedia is launched mere days from now and somehow cause a critical mass of editors to move over there.
Please don't make me laugh. So long as WP keeps its fanatical cult going, no one will successfully challenge it.

I've added this stuff to the book wiki--stupid as it is, it's exactly what the book wiki is intended for.

Did anyone ever find out or keep track of which en-WP accounts Grabowski was using? I've seen it claimed that he was editing in the Polish article area before.
With this, it's safe to say that the "doomsday scenario" is going to be in speedrun mode.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 3889
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Has thanked: 718 times
Been thanked: 1370 times

Re: Research Article: Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Mar 20, 2023 1:04 am

boredbird wrote:
Sun Mar 19, 2023 10:56 pm
Must use Glaukopis because Icewhiz.
Funny you should mention that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaukopis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojciech_Muszy%C5%84ski

Created by one "TrangaBellam", who claims to be an "Indian immigrant" apparently now living in the Netherlands. Started editing en-WP in 2020. Being from India is believable....apart from Tranga's rather strange obsession with Polish right-wing politics in the past month.

The article talkpages are full of Tranga fighting with Piotrus and GizzyCatBella about every possible detail. They are following Tranga around in this subject area. Everyone cuckoo, no one "wins". As usual.

Post Reply