Commons admin decheckusered by WMFOffice on behalf of OmbusCom

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1337
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1255 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Commons admin decheckusered by WMFOffice on behalf of OmbusCom

Post by Bbb23sucks » Thu May 25, 2023 8:58 pm

"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

Email: wikipediasucks@disroot.org

Petition to ban Bbb23Wikipedia AlternativeDonate to help French strikers

User avatar
wexter
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2020 4:18 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 279 times

Re: Commons admin decheckusered by WMFOffice on behalf of OmbusCom

Post by wexter » Thu May 25, 2023 9:20 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Thu May 25, 2023 8:58 pm
Found this today: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special ... ommonswiki

On the same day, the user "semi-retired" on several wikis.

Was also indefinitely banned from functionary roles with one year appeal.
It may just be something totally innocuous - starting in 2021

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... =617343941
This user is currently experiencing health issues that may affect their ability to work on Commons. Please bear in mind that these issues may temporarily affect this user's ability to carry out their usual duties. This user may not consequently be able to respond to talk page messages or e-mails in a timely manner during affected periods, and your patience is greatly appreciated.
What is amazing to me is that Wikipedia has a "thin bench," a very very limited (and declining) number of people that exert quite a bit of effort keeping the platform operational (and dysfunctional).
Wikipedia - "Barely competent and paranoid. There’s a hell of a combination."

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1099 times
Been thanked: 1797 times

Re: Commons admin decheckusered by WMFOffice on behalf of OmbusCom

Post by ericbarbour » Thu May 25, 2023 11:04 pm

wexter wrote:
Thu May 25, 2023 9:20 pm
What is amazing to me is that Wikipedia has a "thin bench," a very very limited (and declining) number of people that exert quite a bit of effort keeping the platform operational (and dysfunctional).
En-WP is now down to 464 "active" admins out of 905. 349 are listed as "semi-active" and 88 are "inactive" and subject to being dumped the next time their "community" decides to clean house again.

A good number are finagling their contributions to appear "active". Realistically, I figure that maybe 200 of them are actually doing serious amounts of work. These are all-time low figures. WIthout edit and admin bots, WP would be drowning.

Commons is even worse: down to 184 "active" admins. As I recall, at one time there were more than 700. Their database has been diddled to hide the historical statistics. Again, many of them are inactive and lying about it. Watching over 93 MILLION images, many never checked for copyright issues or legality. Also have only 6 bureaucrats and 4 oversighters left.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1337
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1255 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Commons admin decheckusered by WMFOffice on behalf of OmbusCom

Post by Bbb23sucks » Thu May 25, 2023 11:24 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Thu May 25, 2023 11:04 pm
Also have only 6 bureaucrats and 4 oversighters left.
That's probably the most concerning part. After all, Bureaucrats are not needed often. While Oversighters need to be active 24/7 and only two of them are actually active. I wonder how long the oversight queue is.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

Email: wikipediasucks@disroot.org

Petition to ban Bbb23Wikipedia AlternativeDonate to help French strikers

Post Reply