Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

Post by Bbb23sucks » Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:33 am

Ognistysztorm wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 4:56 am
That alone should irk many liberals and progressives.
And centrists. And Jews. And non-fascist conservatives. And just about everyone who isn't a Nazi.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4626
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

Post by ericbarbour » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:44 am

Ognistysztorm wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 4:28 am
I know of a Canadian YouTuber JJ. McCullough who had repeatedly dissed Wikipedia on Twitter many times. He was a former editor and even an admin, and because of issues in his encyclopedic article he turned sour on them and retired while remaining in good-standing. If enough coaxing is done I'm sure that he'll prove a great ally.
Oh? What name did he use on WP? You must be talking about this shitshow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... omination)

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 274 times

Re: Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

Post by Bbb23sucks » Sat Sep 02, 2023 9:22 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:44 am
Oh? What name did he use on WP?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vzbs34
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 860
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

Post by Kumioko » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:11 pm

Personally I believe it is possible to destabilize Wikipedia but it wouldn't be easy and woukd require significant funding.

They would need to avoid the mistakes of Wikipedia yet capitalize on its strengths. For example: all the content on Wikipedia is freely distributable. So you can pretty much peel out anything you want. That would give you a pretty good start on a new project after removing the template cruft.

Beaking it by topic, more like how fandom does it has some advantages allowing different Wikiprojects to improve the content how they see fit while avoiding the cross projecr drama.

Of course this is all easier said than done but ive been doing this for years on the military history project and thus far its worked fairly well.
#BbbGate

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Critic
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 199 times

Re: Should Wikipedia be co-opted or destroyed?

Post by Ognistysztorm » Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:23 pm

Kumioko wrote:
Mon Sep 04, 2023 3:11 pm
Personally I believe it is possible to destabilize Wikipedia but it wouldn't be easy and woukd require significant funding.

They would need to avoid the mistakes of Wikipedia yet capitalize on its strengths. For example: all the content on Wikipedia is freely distributable. So you can pretty much peel out anything you want. That would give you a pretty good start on a new project after removing the template cruft.

Beaking it by topic, more like how fandom does it has some advantages allowing different Wikiprojects to improve the content how they see fit while avoiding the cross projecr drama.

Of course this is all easier said than done but ive been doing this for years on the military history project and thus far its worked fairly well.
You should make Justapedia your new home. There are too many articles such as those related to the war in Ukraine that needs updating since the fork last year.

Post Reply