Page 2 of 2

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2024 10:04 pm
by Ognistysztorm
A toxic website.

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:13 pm
by Carrite
ChaosMeRee wrote:
Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:34 pm
Not an encyclopedia.

Techbro's last stand.

Threat to children.

Run by children.

Bad for you.

Waste of resources.

Waste of money.

Waste of life.

One epic grift.

Jimmy's biggest regret.

$75 an hour.

Hate over hope.

Fantasy over reality.

Hiding its truth.

Protecting its own.

Works in theory.

Broken in practice.

Experiment gone wrong.

Not easily edited.

Definitely a bureaucracy.

Rather obviously biased.

Unreliable for anything.

Used without caution.

Never used correctly.

Jess Wade's pension.

Stephen Harrison's pension.

Infested with activists.

Still easily manipulated.

Not remotely responsible.

Not remotely accountable.

Not remotely diverse.

Not remotely finished.

Incapable of shame.

Undeserving of praise.

Losing brand value.

Marek Kukula's friend.

David Gerard's ethics.

Wikipediocracy's best friend.

America's biggest shame.

Not worth saving.

Overdue violent destruction.

Probably dies slowly.
That's 126 words, buddy.

t

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 1:57 am
by boredbird
Carrite wrote:
Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:13 pm
That's 126 words, buddy.
Pretty pithy ones, though.

You should see his other posts!

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 7:20 am
by journo
error by omission

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:49 am
by ChaosMeRee
Timmy's vanity press.

:deadbanana:

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2024 5:00 am
by Dr Mario
I can do it in two words:

Wikipedia SUCKS.

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 5:33 pm
by Dr Mario
Reddit as an "encyclopedia".

Both websites need to die.

Re: Describing Wikipedia in 3 words.

Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2024 2:05 am
by ericbarbour
Did anyone do "my butthole itches" yet?