Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
User avatar
Archer
Sucks Fan
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by Archer » Fri Sep 06, 2024 10:42 pm

It's just another trope/label for propagandists and subversives to sling at malcontents; all-our-critics-are-ugly-sexist-racist-homophobic-extra-virgins.

User avatar
Archer
Sucks Fan
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by Archer » Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 am

boredbird wrote:
Tue Jan 16, 2024 8:02 am
she wrote this article
Imagine having to write all that horseshit. How does one even get roped into pointless busywork like that? It's neither interesting, nor intellectually valuable, nor does it serve a "good cause" by any stretch. I almost feel bad for them.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 760 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by boredbird » Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:25 am

Archer wrote:
Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 am
Imagine having to write all that horseshit. How does one even get roped into pointless busywork like that? It's neither interesting, nor intellectually valuable, nor does it serve a "good cause" by any stretch. I almost feel bad for them.
You, don't get it. It validates her self-conception. She views herself in the role of turning men down and that's what this article she wrote is underlyingly about. This is closely related to her claiming to be a lesbian.
Last edited by boredbird on Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Archer
Sucks Fan
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by Archer » Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:28 am

boredbird wrote:
Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:25 am
Archer wrote:
Sat Sep 07, 2024 9:56 am
Imagine having to write all that horseshit. How does one even get roped into pointless busywork like that? It's neither interesting, nor intellectually valuable, nor does it serve a "good cause" by any stretch. I almost feel bad for them.
You, don't get it. It validates her role perception. She views herself in the role of turning men down. This is closely related to her claiming to be a lesbian.
I still don't see the point. Why does every other Wikipedia editor have to be a venal headcase?

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4935
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1284 times
Been thanked: 2026 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by ericbarbour » Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:26 am

Archer wrote:
Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:28 am
Why does every other Wikipedia editor have to be a venal headcase?
Because it was "started" by a venal headcase; and he hired other headcases and made them "administrators".

He didn't even START the damn thing, he merely pushed out the people who DID THE REAL WORK and then took credit for being the "founder". So many lying bastards in one place. And it is primarily because of one lying bastard who signed the checks.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Archer
Sucks Fan
Posts: 200
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by Archer » Fri Sep 13, 2024 7:25 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:26 am
Archer wrote:
Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:28 am
Why does every other Wikipedia editor have to be a venal headcase?
Because it was "started" by a venal headcase; and he hired other headcases and made them "administrators".

He didn't even START the damn thing, he merely pushed out the people who DID THE REAL WORK and then took credit for being the "founder". So many lying bastards in one place. And it is primarily because of one lying bastard who signed the checks.
It sucks, but there are bigger fish to fry. This is useful mostly as an example of a common strategy; an online media stunt intended to impress upon the viewer a particular label and pre-condition the viewer's beliefs about it. Once the public is loaded with this vocabulary, it can then be used as an ad hominem against anyone who might plausibly fit the bill.

User avatar
journo
Sucks Critic
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:57 pm
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by journo » Wed Sep 18, 2024 12:30 pm

People making themselves more physically attractive "converts them to incels" according to Wikipedia.

Image

Image

User avatar
suckadmin
Janitor
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:56 pm
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by suckadmin » Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:26 am

journo wrote:
Wed Sep 18, 2024 12:30 pm
People making themselves more physically attractive "converts them to incels" according to Wikipedia.

Image

Image
I'm not going to bother investigating this but my suspicion is that improving one's looks is one thing but calling the activity looksmaxxing while engaging in it is another

User avatar
journo
Sucks Critic
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:57 pm
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 140 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by journo » Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:50 am

suckadmin wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 5:26 am
I'm not going to bother investigating this but my suspicion is that improving one's looks is one thing but calling the activity looksmaxxing while engaging in it is another
Yea if u lift weights but use a tiktok term to describe it ur part of a 'dangerous subculture' now.

If their actual concern is PSL forums and its descendants they could have just made an article on that subculture or set of forums. But they instead choose to label anyone using words they do as guilty-by-similar-word-usage through selective quoting of bizarre academics.

If someone participates in group bodyslamming at a rock concert and calls it moshing it doesn't 'automatically convert their identity and allegiance to the punk subculture' just because the punk subculture used that one word.

User avatar
suckadmin
Janitor
Posts: 454
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:56 pm
Has thanked: 114 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"

Post by suckadmin » Thu Sep 19, 2024 2:52 pm

journo wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:50 am

If someone participates in group bodyslamming at a rock concert and calls it moshing it doesn't 'automatically convert their identity and allegiance to the punk subculture' just because the punk subculture used that one word.
Maybe not but if you've never moshed can you really call yourself a punk

Post Reply