Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
It's just another trope/label for propagandists and subversives to sling at malcontents; all-our-critics-are-ugly-sexist-racist-homophobic-extra-virgins.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
Imagine having to write all that horseshit. How does one even get roped into pointless busywork like that? It's neither interesting, nor intellectually valuable, nor does it serve a "good cause" by any stretch. I almost feel bad for them.
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
- Has thanked: 760 times
- Been thanked: 359 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
You, don't get it. It validates her self-conception. She views herself in the role of turning men down and that's what this article she wrote is underlyingly about. This is closely related to her claiming to be a lesbian.
Last edited by boredbird on Sat Sep 07, 2024 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
I still don't see the point. Why does every other Wikipedia editor have to be a venal headcase?
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4935
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1284 times
- Been thanked: 2026 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
Because it was "started" by a venal headcase; and he hired other headcases and made them "administrators".
He didn't even START the damn thing, he merely pushed out the people who DID THE REAL WORK and then took credit for being the "founder". So many lying bastards in one place. And it is primarily because of one lying bastard who signed the checks.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 44 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
It sucks, but there are bigger fish to fry. This is useful mostly as an example of a common strategy; an online media stunt intended to impress upon the viewer a particular label and pre-condition the viewer's beliefs about it. Once the public is loaded with this vocabulary, it can then be used as an ad hominem against anyone who might plausibly fit the bill.ericbarbour wrote: ↑Fri Sep 13, 2024 5:26 amBecause it was "started" by a venal headcase; and he hired other headcases and made them "administrators".
He didn't even START the damn thing, he merely pushed out the people who DID THE REAL WORK and then took credit for being the "founder". So many lying bastards in one place. And it is primarily because of one lying bastard who signed the checks.
-
- Janitor
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:56 pm
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
I'm not going to bother investigating this but my suspicion is that improving one's looks is one thing but calling the activity looksmaxxing while engaging in it is another
-
- Sucks Critic
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:57 pm
- Has thanked: 68 times
- Been thanked: 140 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
Yea if u lift weights but use a tiktok term to describe it ur part of a 'dangerous subculture' now.
If their actual concern is PSL forums and its descendants they could have just made an article on that subculture or set of forums. But they instead choose to label anyone using words they do as guilty-by-similar-word-usage through selective quoting of bizarre academics.
If someone participates in group bodyslamming at a rock concert and calls it moshing it doesn't 'automatically convert their identity and allegiance to the punk subculture' just because the punk subculture used that one word.
-
- Janitor
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 2:56 pm
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
Re: Wikipedians are unable to establish any coherent definition for "incel"
Maybe not but if you've never moshed can you really call yourself a punk