"NoFap" on Wikipedia

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

"NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:14 pm

"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1141 times
Been thanked: 1842 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:14 pm
This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu
Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life
Last edited by ericbarbour on Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm
Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:14 pm
This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu
Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:09 am

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm
ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm
Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:14 pm
This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu
Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
The OP got BSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keyhound
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
journo
Sucks Fan
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:57 pm
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by journo » Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:43 am

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm
ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm
Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 7:14 pm
This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu
Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
What happened on it? Yea I have a feeling someone or some people on WP is following you around everywhere. One reason being someone seems to have archived the shit out of your posts on this forum. This even extended to someone archiving when certain people liked certain posts of yours.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:01 am

journo wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:43 am
Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm
ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 8:14 pm


Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
What happened on it? Yea I have a feeling someone or some people on WP is following you around everywhere. One reason being someone seems to have archived the shit out of your posts on this forum. This even extended to someone archiving when certain people liked certain posts of yours.
Do you think it's a sock of davidp?
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Wed Feb 21, 2024 2:32 am

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:09 am
The OP got BSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keyhound
Assume Bad Faith working very well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... _apologies
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:19 am

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
Most of the important information can be found in a later post that was not OSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... st_removal
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by Bbb23sucks » Wed Feb 21, 2024 11:00 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:19 am
Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Feb 19, 2024 9:44 pm
Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.
Most of the important information can be found in a later post that was not OSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... st_removal
Was RevDeled. Archive: https://archive.is/cYLae
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1141 times
Been thanked: 1842 times

Re: "NoFap" on Wikipedia

Post by ericbarbour » Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:18 pm

thanks, and in case nobody noticed it:
tamzin-talks-to-self.png
tamzin-talks-to-self.png (30.42 KiB) Viewed 19471 times

Post Reply