Page 1 of 2
Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:41 pm
by journo
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2024 10:55 pm
by journo
Neither Wikimedia nor the Wikipedia community has responded to the offer by the world's richest man to call themselves dickheads by name.
However, Elon's EN:WP page has been copyedited a ton since the most recent Elon statements, as well as a few more negative statements added.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1264668438
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2024 6:56 am
by Bbb23sucks
Already discussed:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3083
As a side note, the funniest thing about Elon Musk is that most of the people who hate him now loved him five years ago.
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2024 8:21 pm
by Ognistysztorm
Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2024 6:56 am
Already discussed:
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3083
As a side note, the funniest thing about Elon Musk is that most of the people who hate him now loved him five years ago.
Latest from Elon Musk:
https://entrevue.fr/en/elon-musk-appell ... ogie-woke/
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2024 9:47 am
by Ognistysztorm
Don’t take it from me (I’m just a frog after all), take it from the co-founder of Wikipedia
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1873992969378029874
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2025 1:28 am
by badmachine
much hay is being made on social media of the removal from Bill Clinton's wikipedia article of all mentions of Jeffrey Epstein
on July 22 2024. the user who moved the content to the lesser viewed 'sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton' article is called
ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter, now blocked as a sockpuppet of
InPursuitOfAMorePerfectUnion. do we know anything about this user? to the naked eye it seems to be a Brit with an interest in American politics but the Epstein deletion makes it seem like this is a spook from one of America's numerous three-letter-agencies.
here is the tweet from Elon Musk:
link
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 4:43 pm
by Archer
Clownish nonsense. I despise twitter.
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 9:10 pm
by ericbarbour
badmachine wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2025 1:28 am
much hay is being made on social media of the removal from Bill Clinton's wikipedia article of all mentions of Jeffrey Epstein
on July 22 2024. the user who moved the content to the lesser viewed 'sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton' article is called
ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter, now blocked as a sockpuppet of
InPursuitOfAMorePerfectUnion. do we know anything about this user? to the naked eye it seems to be a Brit with an interest in American politics but the Epstein deletion makes it seem like this is a spook from one of America's numerous three-letter-agencies.
chances of that are pretty good--spy agencies have piddled around on various WPs before.
Clownish nonsense. I despise twitter.
Many do, yet I continue to see "prominent journalists" hanging around on the thing. They have been REPEATEDLY told to stop using it as a "source", and find another place to jabber at each other about political trivia and post pics of their lunches, but they just won't give it up--even when Musk (MR. FREE SPEECH!) bans them because they (remember Ken Klippenstein? remember Glenn Greenwald? remember
this?) posted something Musk didn't like.
The average working journalist is a damn fool and a lazy turd, I am forced to conclude. Even the ones at the New York Times. Journalists also use Wikipedia as a "reliable background source" even when they really should not.
https://www.theverge.com/23671036/journ ... musk-media
https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/04/the-n ... n-a-while/
https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/baq ... policy.php
https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/12/2368 ... c-substack
And yes kids: tesladeaths.com is STILL being updated. They openly admit their listings are hopelessly inaccurate and they get almost no reports from non-English-language countries. Teslas are being sold in at least 28 countries at present.
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2025 10:40 pm
by Strelnikov
....and yet I continue to see "prominent journalists" hanging around on the thing. They have been REPEATEDLY told to stop using it as a "source"....
You don't understand journalists; they are hanging around hoping somebody spills the beans on something under the rule of "where there's smoke there has to be fire". There have been leaks on Twitter in the past or at least clues that lead to bigger stories. Mastodon is boring. BlueSky is allegedly an echo chamber. Twitter is where right-wing assholes hang out thanks to Musk, and some of them are involved with the forthcoming Trump omnishambles "administration", so of course journos are hanging around.
Re: Elon Musk re-offers Wikimedia 1 Billion USD to rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" for a year
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:04 am
by ericbarbour
Strelnikov wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2025 10:40 pm
Twitter is where right-wing assholes hang out thanks to Musk, and some of them are involved with the forthcoming Trump omnishambles "administration", so of course journos are hanging around.
Yes, I get that. Problem is when they foolishly take what they see in there as "factual". Musk is doing all kinds of things in the background to prevent "factuality". We don't even know what, because it was always secretive, and under him it became more paranoid than, say, the NSA.