A 700 million dollar $ Wikipedia paid editing scandal
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:01 pm
Don't know what to make of all this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... enterprise
6. Vipul should be aware that an outside agency could preliminary assess / value the "gross receipts" of his enterprise as $2.1 * 6,600,000 * 50 ie. about $700 million dollars. So I am not certain if the wider community of paid editors would accept the sort of transparency Vipul displays
These estimates are based on Jonathan E. Hochman's SEO consulting website. also Jehochman of Arbcom fame. $2.1 is the cost per link click, 6,600,000 is the self declared number of page views by sock-master Vipul Naik and 50 is the .number of "spam" links to badsites on a typical Vipul Private Enterprise created article.
If anybody factors in the 1.1% clickthrough rate from Jehochman's data (which Wikipediots can't challenge) conservatively this works out to a $7 million paid editing scandal by a pyramid scheme of paid editors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... enterprise
6. Vipul should be aware that an outside agency could preliminary assess / value the "gross receipts" of his enterprise as $2.1 * 6,600,000 * 50 ie. about $700 million dollars. So I am not certain if the wider community of paid editors would accept the sort of transparency Vipul displays
These estimates are based on Jonathan E. Hochman's SEO consulting website. also Jehochman of Arbcom fame. $2.1 is the cost per link click, 6,600,000 is the self declared number of page views by sock-master Vipul Naik and 50 is the .number of "spam" links to badsites on a typical Vipul Private Enterprise created article.
If anybody factors in the 1.1% clickthrough rate from Jehochman's data (which Wikipediots can't challenge) conservatively this works out to a $7 million paid editing scandal by a pyramid scheme of paid editors.