Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
There was a scandal years ago where Jimmy used the Wikipedia debit card on vacation in Moscow, buying expensive liquor, lap dances, and call girls. That was money donated by people to help the site, but Jimbo is a textbook narcissist.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1419 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Yeah I know. There was a thread somewhere I think.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 6:55 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Jimmy Wales not running it doesn't worsen it.
He's a hypocrite as it is. He claimed in an Interview "We're an open democracy."
Apparently the guy hasn't even read his own policies. Even besides that, he's corrupt head to toe. He was alleged to have offered edits for donations.
Can't really trust him. Sorry Jimbo.![Whambo :whambo:](./images/smilies/Whambo.gif)
He's a hypocrite as it is. He claimed in an Interview "We're an open democracy."
Apparently the guy hasn't even read his own policies. Even besides that, he's corrupt head to toe. He was alleged to have offered edits for donations.
Can't really trust him. Sorry Jimbo.
![Whambo :whambo:](./images/smilies/Whambo.gif)
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
- Contact:
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
lotsa luck finding it. idk whether google is censoring it or whether wikipediareview has added noindex to their site. for its part, wikipedia review has removed its search capability.
Wikipedia Review wrote:Sorry, the administrator has taken the search engine offline for the moment. Please try again later
but it was a big deal at the time. maybe someone has an archive of it somewhere.
![Shrug :shrug:](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Last edited by badmachine on Fri Feb 02, 2024 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1419 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
I've been thinking about making a Wikipedia Review archive for a long time. Do you know anyone who might have the some iteration of the database? I tried contacting the zordrac guy, but he disappeared right before I did.badmachine wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 9:38 pmlotsa luck finding it. idk whether google is censoring it or whether wikipediareview has added noindex to their site. for its part, wikipedia review has removed its search capability.
Wikipedia Review wrote:Sorry, the administrator has taken the search engine offline for the moment. Please try again later
but it was a big deal at the time. maybe someone has an archive of it somewhere.![]()
Also, I think the thread (at least the one I read) was either here or on WPO.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4674
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1182 times
- Been thanked: 1880 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Not "alleged", "PROVABLE". Google/Alphabet employees enjoy "special non-defamatory treatment" on WP to this day. Similar things have happened for BLPs of prominent Wikipedia fans, including the founders of Creative Commons, Sunlight Foundation, Berkman Center, Knight Foundation, Craig Newmark and Craigslist, etc.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Sat Feb 03, 2024 12:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 586 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
- Contact:
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
i wish. maybe Eric has archives or at least linksBbb23sucks wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:02 pmI've been thinking about making a Wikipedia Review archive for a long time. Do you know anyone who might have the some iteration of the database?
![Shrug :shrug:](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
as for the wmf credit card, there are indeed threads that mention it on wpo but the scandal[?] seems to originate from Danny Wool's blog.
but the wpo threads contain links like this one that mentions the !scandal:
https://www.smh.com.au/technology/wikip ... ds3ve.html
-
- Sucks
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2018 11:14 pm
- Been thanked: 112 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
There are a few good posts on this forum about the activities of SlimVirgin, but I didn't see much on the Essjay scandal. The link below shows some information about Essjay, who wanted to participate in this new adventure.
As I recall, his real name was revealed when some Wikipedia hotshots were contemplating a Wikipedia spinoff involving some present and former admins. They were considering what was needed to incorporate legally. In the course of discussing this, Essjay's real name was revealed.
When I noticed this discussion on another forum, I blew the whistle on Essjay's real name by using my fax machine to notify The New Yorker. Essjay had made up all those fancy titles concerning his high-level contacts and activities with the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and his extremely-impressive academic credentials.. The New Yorker was embarrassed, and they spilled the beans in an editor's note in the next issue.
https://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia ... ontroversy
As I recall, his real name was revealed when some Wikipedia hotshots were contemplating a Wikipedia spinoff involving some present and former admins. They were considering what was needed to incorporate legally. In the course of discussing this, Essjay's real name was revealed.
When I noticed this discussion on another forum, I blew the whistle on Essjay's real name by using my fax machine to notify The New Yorker. Essjay had made up all those fancy titles concerning his high-level contacts and activities with the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and his extremely-impressive academic credentials.. The New Yorker was embarrassed, and they spilled the beans in an editor's note in the next issue.
https://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia ... ontroversy
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Conservapedia, the highly reliable source...Daniel Brandt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 5:33 amThere are a few good posts on this forum about the activities of SlimVirgin, but I didn't see much on the Essjay scandal. The link below shows some information about Essjay, who wanted to participate in this new adventure.
As I recall, his real name was revealed when some Wikipedia hotshots were contemplating a Wikipedia spinoff involving some present and former admins. They were considering what was needed to incorporate legally. In the course of discussing this, Essjay's real name was revealed.
When I noticed this discussion on another forum, I blew the whistle on Essjay's real name by using my fax machine to notify The New Yorker. Essjay had made up all those fancy titles concerning his high-level contacts and activities with the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and his extremely-impressive academic credentials.. The New Yorker was embarrassed, and they spilled the beans in an editor's note in the next issue.
https://www.conservapedia.com/Wikipedia ... ontroversy
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4674
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1182 times
- Been thanked: 1880 times
Re: Why We Hate Wikipedia / Ten things you probably didn't know about Wikipedia
Agreed. That was the day Wikipedia's near-vertical participation growth started to falter. It was an inauspicious scandal for the "Magical Encyclopedia That Cannot Be Wrong" or whatever you want to call the damn thing.Daniel Brandt wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 5:33 amThere are a few good posts on this forum about the activities of SlimVirgin, but I didn't see much on the Essjay scandal.
The problem with documenting Essjay is: we have far TOO MUCH info on the book wiki. Up to 96k bytes, making it one of the longest articles. Too long to post on a forum. Loads of now-dated drivel, mostly about Jimbo fucking up and trying to apologize. Wikipedians love to rage type at each other. Most of it is unreadable.
The list of things Essjay did "for" Wikipedia is long and disturbing.
- Jimbo installed him on everything, usually without consultation, and only Jimbo can accept the ultimate blame.
- You can thank Essjay for starting the "Countervandalism Unit", thus ushering in the era of the "patroller", who today has great political power on WP while not actually making content. Or doing anything else of real value.
- Essjay gave us the "Esperanza" thing, which failed horribly.
- Essjay's conduct showed quite clearly that Wikipedia nerds would accept any level of lying, prevarication, and manipulation, in return for their "powerz". Just like any good little cult.
- And in spite of all that scandal, Jimbo Bimbo turned right around and hired Essjay to work at Wikia.
If I see that "I have been for several days in a remote part of India with little or no Internet access" quote from Jimbo once more, I will vomit.curprev 20:32, 5 March 2007 Thatcher talk contribs m 1,897 bytes 0 Protected User talk:Essjay: find somewhere else to discuss the implications of these events; serious concerns exist but Essjay's talk page is not in projectspace and is not a forum for addressing them [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
curprev 20:30, 5 March 2007 Thatcher talk contribs 1,897 bytes −56,023 Enough! If Essjay was here he would have the right to delete comments as he saw fit; just because he is gone is not an acceptable reason to leave this here
curprev 20:27, 5 March 2007 Munta talk contribs 57,920 bytes +56,023 ←Undid revision 112886238 by Hipocrite (talk)Stop removing content premiturely and without concensus
curprev 20:26, 5 March 2007 Hipocrite talk contribs 1,897 bytes −56,023 per agreement down at the bottom, blanking
Last edited by ericbarbour on Tue Feb 13, 2024 6:37 am, edited 2 times in total.