Page 1 of 2
A Quiz
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 7:11 pm
by Graaf Statler
Because it is so mysterious what the socks from Drmies are I have decided to make a quiz out of it.
(special because of this posting of Arthur)I hope WhoReallyCares is a bit helpful just like in the battle "Bonecruncher' Timmy won. Allright, here we go.
A sock of Drmies are:
1)Jimmy Wales
2)James Alexander.
3)Katherine Maher
4)Crownest
4)Dysklyver
5)Bezdomn
6)Thekohser
7)Kumioko
8)Poetlister
9)Randy from Boise
10)Eric Corbett
This is my list of socks of Drmies. Who has a better one?
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:06 pm
by Graaf Statler
Sure Michel!
Drmies wrote:I have a few alternative accounts, all of which are disclosed to ArbCom, and none of which get in the way of "usual" business. For the peanut gallery, I'll be a bit more specific: I used to have a few "funny" accounts, but I forgot their names, and if I remember correctly they were created for me by someone else. It's been ages. I have an account I use for teaching Wikipedia classes. And I have a near-dormant account, last used in May of last year, which has a female user name and was an experiment in seeing how female editors are treated; she's not been very active, and what she's done has been mostly in article, not Wikipedia space. It's a very busy time for me right now workwise, and I hope I will be able to answer all y'all's questions in a timely manner--but next spring should be more calm than this.
We all believe you Michel. If you say you don have any controversial sock
vertrouwen we je op je blauwe ogen.
Natuurlijk. We rely on your blue eyes. Twelve times. Yes, we do.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:14 am
by CrowsNest
Opabina Regalis
Ealdgyth
Softlavender
All of these accounts could conceivably be Drmies pretending to be a woman.
Let's face it, it's a more plausible explanation that them actually being women.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 10:37 am
by Graaf Statler
Bezdomni wrote:I sent him a private mail last night asking about Rosashills and asked him pretty much the same questions as above. He confirmed what I'd read about valid-alt accounts, and straightforwardly gave me an idea of the kind of special purpose accounts he had. Basically, I've thought this question was pointless from the beginning because as orangepi says above, it's quite unlikely that Drmies runs Russavia... and even more unlikely that he would volunteer anything damaging. Though he mentioned 5 accounts in his mail (counting Drmies), he doesn't have access to the passwords for a couple he himself didn't create but that were fun, and the remaining two were legitimate purpose accounts (one for behavioral research, & one "pro" account that's been spoken about off-wiki quite a bit already). (btw: I think he may have answered these questions before, because the behavioral research he told me about, I'm pretty sure I've read about before)
I was impressed with the speed with which he replied, and certainly found his answer satisfying as a curious voter regarding his alt accounts.
I also sort of proxied for Genderdesk in asking the question I saw in her last post "Drmies and the Far-Right Rally Articles" (§): why is there a gun and so much blood and cabalabilia on his user page? (I didn't ask about the cabalabilia as such, just about the gun and the blood.) He explained the Ikea meme to me, said the gun was obvious and then said, again, that he didn't know what the GenderDesk was. Maybe if enough people tell him about that place he'll google himself there. Or not.
Yeh, Drmies gave his accounts, but you are not mention all of them. Because one you don't mention, and yes, that was related to Russavia, but it was indeed not Russavia....
A typical expat, a obvious sock with high relations in the Dutch wiki community
and WMF, able to fix a global lock/ban based on nothing, a Reddit fan, always editing in the office hours of the university where Drmies is a employee is a Duck.
Kwek, kwek, kwak. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. But if it looks like a rat, behaves like a rat, and quacks like a rat, it is for sure a rat!And again, Bezdomni, it is not the fist time I ask you, what is your roll in this strange matter because I am not impressed at all you got so quick a answer.
But why don't you just tell the treu? Why all these cheap lies and
toneelstukjes van de vrijwillige brandweer?
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:12 pm
by Graaf Statler
It is an exciting quiz. I am wondering when uncle Jack puts the topic in the members only section.
Dysklyver wrote:So we have;
* Unknown "funny" accounts that might be embarrassing
* A teaching account, aka
Dr Aaij (T-C-L)
* A sock he uses for research ojn how female editors are treated
well, I am wondering how much Dutch expats are living where Professor Aai is living who have a excellent reputation in the Dutch wikipedia community so it is very easy for them to become with a sock a Arb and a powerful and leading sysop. And who are interested in writing articles about old and forgotten Dutch professors. And who are writing English on a near native level.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 12:34 pm
by sashi
My dear Graaf, I often have wondered who you might be the agitprop sock of, but have progressively gone on an investigative diet in an effort to somehow manage to be enlightened enough to fit into my en.wp cell.
This is what I was counseled to do when I went into the village square and asked to be unblocked.
Shock Harvester died recently. Though my own (very limited) interactions biased me against him a bit, I've read things he's written that I liked a lot. The guy seemed to have a deep understanding of the place.
There might be a clue to it all in that anagram... raving loony "on vainglory": the wixycontin rush others have written so well about is something that affects a lot of internet loudmouths. I don't remember if it was Saulnier or Bakhtin (probably the latter) who said that the main character of Pantagruel (Rabelais' second book) was a gaping mouth. Dürer certainly agreed when he was illustrating the book.
Regarding Wikipedia, it's surely not by accident that one sees
Le Cri on so many user pages.
One of my "students", incidentally, often remembers to tease me about my CIA job, so there's that, if you needed any further evidence of my nefariosity.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:00 pm
by Graaf Statler
My dear sashi, I am really wondering why you have accepted this extreem poor role in het jaarlijkse toneelstukje van de vrijwillige brandweer. I realy hope you are a better academician then actor. But I have a quoestion to you. Why don't your guys do not write a better script? It is so boring with all the same troll tricks over and over.
And do you know what was the huge disappointing for me? Well, let me tell you.
I know all your troll tricks including fake arbom cases, fake blocks, going on with socking, fox hunting with abitroll and Meta from WPNL. They have become a kind of family to me, all that trolls like Romaine, CaAL, Trijnstel, etc. I know them like my brothers with there complete troll arsenal. You become attached to them, you mis them when they are not there.
Ok, I was a bit disappointing to see those same tttrrroll tricks are used also on WPEN and WO over and over.
But the nice thing is I found in you, Ming, Jake, Timmy as a kind kind of new wiki family back. A complete new generation trolls with the same old troll tricks!
When are you going to say I am so confused? Or a madman? Because you started already with paranoia. A pity you don't have trigger happy Jakeass here, isn't it? Because it should feel a bit more wikipedia in that way, more at home. A warning, a block, jammie!
Do you know why I mixed Ming up with Romaine in the beginning? You got got it, because he was using exacte the same troll guide. Serious!
Come on, shasi, a child can see Natuur12 is a sock of Michel, why do you keep on telling lies? Not nice to lie to family.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:11 pm
by CrowsNest
Sashi's significance to Drmies is no mystery Graaf. He is in his debt. He must repay this debt by informing him of things he already knows about, so he can be seen to be acting on the concerns of people, not unpeople.
It's what they do. Think of the Chimpanzees, how they have all manner of different ways to signal their position in the heirarchy. Through expert tuition, an EU inspired collaboration if you will, Sashi is now in a position to study their ways from the inside, he knows how to fit in. Sort of.
Think of him as a Man in a Chimpanzee suit, out in the deepest darkest forests, passing fruits and stroking chins. An uncomfortable existence, dangerous even, but sometimes necessary when doing important scientific studies of the lower Orders of Life.
But I told you before, we're not supposed to tell people what's really going on. It taints the Experiment, and denies us our Findings.
So SSSHHHHH!
But I think we're OK though.
Chimps can't read. Well, that's what they tell us anyway.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:21 pm
by CrowsNest
sashi wrote:Shock Harvester died recently.
May he not rest in peace.
I have paid my respects at his unofficial Wikipedia obituary. Did you send flowers, my Dear Dr. Livingstone?
I have a quiz. I posted it on a previous forum, since exploded by Dark Forces.
How many Wikipedians, are Good Wikipedians? 
Like all advanced tests of intelligence, the Chimpanzees couldn't get their heads around it.
Re: A Quiz
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:27 pm
by Graaf Statler
Sorry, I have now the giggles. They are so extreem stupide, I can't believe such a stupide people exist! Because it is so clear what happend! That stupide wikipedians where trolling and found that wrong Myheritage page, Drmies organized a nice fox hunting together with that complete backward Ymnes and the cabal, and Professor Michel and his friends ended up in deep in the wikishit at the end. Of course that Romaine fiasco in the Europarlement didn't help the matter, because I was all the time right and they where wrong.
And now they are more than two years searching for a troll way out. Because it was of course a dramatic blunder of Alexander, that SanFanBan. But you can't say we where wrong if you are a wikipedian. No you can't, wikipedians are always right and never make a mistake!.