Flip Flopped wrote:The Jar'Edo Wens hoax did not involve criminal content in any way. That is clear.Soham321 wrote:"other criminal content" is a broad term. Earlier in this thread, you wrote "It was admittedly biased against Australian Aboriginal religion but unless any Australian Aboriginal was targeted based on it then there isn't the faintest relationship to the potential new law." In other words you yourself are not certain of whether this hoax would be an instance of "other criminal content".Flip Flopped wrote:There was no criminal content in the Jar'Edo Wens Wikipedia hoax.
You should take your complaint up the chain.
Bottomline is that If you insist on getting into a shit flinging contest with me here (and note that i stopped posting on PB WR only because of your excessive censorship about which i complained publicly) then i am happy to oblige you, but you'll have to resign as a moderator on this forum first. You can't have it both ways. Either abuse me as an ordinary forum member, or retain your Moderator responsibilities. You can't do both.
Take your complaint up with the others. The rules here specify that there may be disturbing content.
You complained over on the other forum because you felt that forum had to host your massage video that showed full frontal male nudity. That content didn't fit that forum and the other staff agreed without hesitation.
1. The massage content did *not* show full frontal male nudity. I posted the videos elsewhere because i anticipated this would come up at some point of time:
http://wikipediasucks.forumotion.com/t8 ... ic-massage
They are definitely not pornographic. Head massages are a part of Indian culture, Turkish massages (in a turkish bath) are a part of turkish culture. Hungarian baths (in special hot water pools) are a part of hungarian culture. There was nothing sexual in these videos. Censoring these videos shows a lack of respect for other cultures.
2. I made it clear that i stopped posting on the forum not because you censored the massage videos but because you started censoring relatively innocuous words like "ass". You informed me that you would not allow me to post this limerick:
There was a girl from Madras
who had a magnificent ass
it wasn't round and pink,as you probably think
it was grey, had long ears, and ate grass
After I left, Auggie removed the relatively innocuous words you had put in the censored words list. (Privately Auggie informed me that "i had a point" with respect to the large number of words you had started censoring.)
3. You write that "The Jar'Edo Wens hoax did not involve criminal content in any way. That is clear." But in an earlier post in this thread you said you were not sure. As you wrote "It was admittedly biased against Australian Aboriginal religion but unless any Australian Aboriginal was targeted based on it then there isn't the faintest relationship to the potential new law."
4. I gave links to some fake news content on WP in this thread after you made a specific request to me to do so.
5. My analysis is that you are feeling humiliated after I publicly protested your excessive censorship on PB WR and quit PB WR. You have been waiting to strike back at an opportune moment, and you thought this was it.
6. I am not going to ask anybody to remove you as Mod. I know as a Mod you don't have the power to ban me and that is good enough for me.
7. But I will keep reminding you that it is unethical and immoral on your part to indulge in shit flinging in a forum where you are also a Mod whenever you attempt to throw any shit at me. That will be sufficient to cover you with your own shit.