Wikipedia Sucks!

Soham321 wrote:1. There are clear rules on WP's blocking policy. However, in my experience, whenever it suits the WP Admins they freely flout these rules. Let me give a few examples.
<.TL;DR crap.>
4. WP:UNBLOCKABLE is essentially unfair. It implies that experienced editors who should know better can go ahead and bully newbies. And if the newbies respond in kind, Admins who are friendly with the unblockable editor (perhaps even in personal communication through email, phone, or even in person during WP conferences) can come along and sanction the newbies. Admins like Bishonen enjoy doing this a lot in a sadistic kind of way.

Your Wikipedia addiction shows no sign of abating.
Admit it, What you really miss is the power to troll Suhel Seth, promote yourself, and deface Arun Jaitley's article on a website with 10,000 times the traffic over here.

HRA1924 wrote:

Soham321 wrote:1. There are clear rules on WP's blocking policy. However, in my experience, whenever it suits the WP Admins they freely flout these rules. Let me give a few examples.
<.TL;DR crap.>
4. WP:UNBLOCKABLE is essentially unfair. It implies that experienced editors who should know better can go ahead and bully newbies. And if the newbies respond in kind, Admins who are friendly with the unblockable editor (perhaps even in personal communication through email, phone, or even in person during WP conferences) can come along and sanction the newbies. Admins like Bishonen enjoy doing this a lot in a sadistic kind of way.

Your Wikipedia addiction shows no sign of abating.
Admit it, What you really miss is the power to troll Suhel Seth, promote yourself, and deface Arun Jaitley's article on a website with 10,000 times the traffic over here.

One of these two names is the name of the person who allegedly hired Toby Dollman to complain to ProBoards. Why not just tell everyone at this point, HRA?

.

Flip Flopped wrote:One of these two names is the name of the person who allegedly hired Toby Dollman to complain to ProBoards. Why not just tell everyone at this point, HRA?

#1 "Kato" is HRA1924 on auggie's forum and was HRA node11 on WS-1
#2 HRA on sucks.co was HRA on WS-1
#3 Wikipediacritics (Inc.) is the same on both forums, and posted through both the above accounts on WS-1, and was also HRA node3 there and Engelbert H, Sir Isaaac Mewton etc.

Toby Dollman is a former colleague of "Kato" and his firm works in IPR, litigation and defamation takedowns for Asian and Latin American clients on social media. We can confirm that a notice was issued to Proboards for 2 specific Soham321 posts on WS-1 defaming an Indian BLP and calling for their suppression, but instead PB (for reasons known best to them and Mutineer) took down the entire forum within 24 hours. Kato was independently aware of the posts and had indicated to WS-1 mods to enforce PB rules urgently. But Mutineer's attitude (which mirrors TDK's) was that of a scofflaw and HRA was blocked at WS-1 on a Soham complaint.

.

Soham321 wrote:1. could you confirm whether this thread contained the problematic posts?
http://archive.is/CVdld
2. I complained about HRA because of the repeated filthy and foul language he was using, and I did so publicly on the forum. I never asked for HRA to be blocked. I just wanted them to stop abusing me repeatedly.
3. The article history of Suhel Seth's page on WP is worth taking a look at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... on=history

You acknowledged on PB that you repeatedly entered defamatory content on Wikipedia which you knew was incorrect, and that these libels were removed on Wikipedia - which aggrieved you and also that you were thereafter indefinitely blocked on Wikipedia and you again began using PB to libel that person. You satisfy all 4 points of the 4 point test on defamation a) wide circulation of comments like "slimy character" b) admisssion that you knew the libels were false c) Another webhost removing your libels d) Your continuiing to spread those deleted libels on Proboards.

Could there be a more blatant case than yours for Arun Jaitley's social media team to identify and target you (and we mean you) ? If WS-1 went down it was because of lax moderation in its final days.

I don't recall the HRA account on WS-1 ever using filthy and foul language. It was a dispute over "Hindutva" and use of violence to overthrow tyranny.

.

Soham321 wrote:Indians outraged at an attack on women for drinking in a bar have gathered together to send a provocative gift of underwear to right-wing activists.
More than 5,000 people, including men, have joined the Facebook group, which calls itself the Consortium of Pub-going, Loose and Forward Women.
The group says it will give the pink underwear to Sri Ram Sena (Army of Lord Ram) on Valentine's Day on Saturday.
It was blamed for the bar attack in the southern city of Mangalore last month....

The Consortium of Pub-going, Loose and Forward Women, which was formed on Facebook last Thursday, has also exhorted women to "walk to the nearest pub and buy a drink" on Valentine's Day.

A spokeswoman for the group, Nisha Susan, told the BBC it was giving chaddis (Hindi colloquial for underwear) as they alluded to a prominent Hindu right-wing group whose khaki-shorts-wearing cadres were often derisively called "chaddi wallahs" (chaddi wearers).
"We chose the colour pink because it is a frivolous colour," she said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7880377.stm

SHOCKING PINK NEWS
Here is a picture of your Wikipedian Pinko psedo-secular liberal daughter, after publicly canoodling, drinking just after giving her elephant size pink chaddi to a casteless "cutjew" Wikimedia Steward outside a pub in London during the Wikimania holi revels. Cheers

Licence: Creative Commons Licence NCND 3.0

https://s15.postimg.org/49xw969gr/wikimania_steward.jpg

.

Soham321 wrote:And here are a few pictures of chaddiwalahs:The chaddi uniform of Khaki knickers is reminiscent of the uniform worn by Roderick Spode (the famous contemporary of Bertie Wooster and Jeeves) and the cadres of his organization.

This is all quite interesting, but hardly new for us and what does it have to do with HRA (Hindustan Republican Army) ?

1. RSS = Right wing, HRA = EXTREME Left wing
2. RSS = British collabarators who never fought for independence. HRA = actively anti-imperialist dedicated to the philosophy of the bomb with thousands of martyrs (also known as Bengal terrorists).
3. RSS = Vande Mataram , HRA= Jana Gana Mana.

Perhaps this will educate you better than wikipedia.
https://thewire.in/33418/manufactured-a ... -struggle/

If you still have any doubts you can compare the manifesto of HRA and HRA
http://shahidbhagatsingh.org/index.asp? ... olutionary
with
http://indiaagainstcorruption.org.in/in ... CManifesto

So move along, nothing here for you.