ericbarbour wrote:And Mendaliv.....really?
If there were a Guinness Book of Records award for the World's Most Tedious Man, Mendaliv would win.
These fake, wannabe lawyers in WikiVille are so annoying.
ericbarbour wrote:And Mendaliv.....really?
Anyone wrote:ericbarbour wrote:And Mendaliv.....really?
If there were a Guinness Book of Records award for the World's Most Tedious Man, Mendaliv would win.
These fake, wannabe lawyers in WikiVille are so annoying.
Graaf Statler wrote:Anyone wrote:ericbarbour wrote:And Mendaliv.....really?
If there were a Guinness Book of Records award for the World's Most Tedious Man, Mendaliv would win.
These fake, wannabe lawyers in WikiVille are so annoying.
The wiki mouvement love there fake and wannabe lawyers!
They are like the n*azi doctors in the concentration camps of der Herr Hitler, they are complete immoral.
They support the most creasy legal complete bullshit of the wiki mouvement who is now claiming for years they are a exemption and had a "right" to break copyright laws and other regulations. What is simple not true.
There is not any exception for them in local copyright laws. Not any, not a word in our copyright law in Holland is about wiki systems. The exception they maybe get in Europe is for pre-filtering content and nothing else. But we have to see how that works out if it is implanted in the local copyright laws. A general European copyright law is far, far away and properly unreachable seen the political structure of the EU. O, was WMF responsible in your opinion? Good luck with section Section 230 of the Communications Decency Ac!!
But these are not the things those wiki lawyers are telling you or are warning you for, no, they bring you in legal danger in the EU. They don't tell you WMF and it's legal department and the ToU don't give you any protection. Not any! They don't tell you WMF legal department is highly incompetent because of these wiki lawyers. Wiki lawyers give you a umbrella if the sun is shining, and if you want to open it because it start to rain you find out it is eaten by the moths. And you are personal in legal danger. You, yes you are responsible for what you are doing on the internet and other places and no one else.
They don't care about the things I consider as the scandal of the century. First of all someone with as only real succesfull education one class kindergarten has to tell you this, and second when I tried to warn I am treated as I am.
The best proof I was only warring is I have completely relinquished any rights to sue WMF. And I altough I have one of Holland top lawyers in my personal circles I have treated no one with any legal action. Although I have every reason to sue the complete bunch of idiots, but at the moment I have not any plan in that direction.
Because that should cause such a tremendous chaos in the lives for both them and mine and don't give me any joy, I simple don't want this wikishit in the last part of my life.
Just keep your bullshit money, put it in a place where the sun never shines, I don't want it, live your life in a lie, it is your life and not mine. Just fuck yourself with all your bullshit money.
No, worse than that, he's a real life Wikipedia lawyer.Anyone wrote:ericbarbour wrote:And Mendaliv.....really?
If there were a Guinness Book of Records award for the World's Most Tedious Man, Mendaliv would win.
These fake, wannabe lawyers in WikiVille are so annoying.
CrowsNest wrote:As ever, the bright side is that if he's doing it there, he's not fucking up someone's real world shit.
CrowsNest wrote:The starting point has to be to assume "Katie" is just one of Poetlister's legendary experiments with women's clothing.
If not, well, what she does think is acceptable on a forum, doesn't exactly marry with what she doesn't.
Anyone wrote:........Graf are SanFranBanned for being a pair of nuisances.
Look at this bullshit.the_mark wrote:Hmmm. I was like, "Why Fram?" There are plenty more. I guess the choice did not matter.the_grifter wrote:They were more dumb than I could have imagined in their target selection algorithm.
Who should they have banned, if thinking straight? One higher up the food chain? Maybe an Arb?