I have created an account there, but their administrators need an exceedingly long time to unlock it.
On Wikipediocracy, every registration requires administrator's approval.
Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new members.
-
- Sucks Critic
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
- Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
- Has thanked: 109 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new members.
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new memb
CMAwatch wrote:I have created an account there, but their administrators need an exceedingly long time to unlock it.
On Wikipediocracy, every registration requires administrator's approval.
Honestly you're better off not even bothering with this site or Wikipediocracy really.
Wikipediocracy has been completely overwhelmed by Wikipedia insiders so that forum really doesn't do much criticism anymore. It's more admins and enablers than anything else and the forum owners there gave up on making it about criticism by banning or driving out most of the critics and extending WMF bans to include Wikipediocracy.
As for this site. This site is a joke and the forumrunners here don't have any desire for it to be a legitimate criticism site. They allow quacks like Crowsnest to use it as his own personal blog space and attack page repository and then appoint mods who won't do anything except attack or condone attacks on the WMF banned Kumioko.
#BbbGate
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:25 pm
- Has thanked: 413 times
- Been thanked: 264 times
Re: Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new memb
You're free to talk here, Slappy. We have tried to keep stuff on an even keel, but Wikipedians are so used to abusing and being abused, you can't run a normal Wikipedia criticism board.
You ALL need deep therapy and Jimbo should pay for it.
You ALL need deep therapy and Jimbo should pay for it.
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.
Re: Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new memb
If I'm such a quack, why is it all you can seem to do, is copy my own criticism? I was saying that about Wikipediocracy long ago, while you were still posting there, too afraid to say it, or more likely not even thinking it. I thought it, I said it, I got banned for it. Years later, you couldn't even get banned for just being a whiny little bitch who they'd grown bored of, that's how pathetic you are.Kumioko wrote:CMAwatch wrote:I have created an account there, but their administrators need an exceedingly long time to unlock it.
On Wikipediocracy, every registration requires administrator's approval.
Honestly you're better off not even bothering with this site or Wikipediocracy really.
Wikipediocracy has been completely overwhelmed by Wikipedia insiders so that forum really doesn't do much criticism anymore. It's more admins and enablers than anything else and the forum owners there gave up on making it about criticism by banning or driving out most of the critics and extending WMF bans to include Wikipediocracy.
As for this site. This site is a joke and the forumrunners here don't have any desire for it to be a legitimate criticism site. They allow quacks like Crowsnest to use it as his own personal blog space and attack page repository and then appoint mods who won't do anything except attack or condone attacks on the WMF banned Kumioko.
You know what makes me laugh my ass off about your whiny little bitch act? Even after I was banned, Wikipediocracy still begged me to write blogs posts for them. I got banned for being a serious critic whose stuff was simply too hard hitting, too close to the bone, for their membership to be around. I bet they would still publish one even now though, if I offered it, their members being safely insulated from it in that format.
The day anybody begs you to write a blog post, here, there, or anywhere, I'll check the temperature here in Crow towers.
Re: Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new memb
Strelnikov wrote:You're free to talk here, Slappy. We have tried to keep stuff on an even keel, but Wikipedians are so used to abusing and being abused, you can't run a normal Wikipedia criticism board.
You ALL need deep therapy and Jimbo should pay for it.
Go fuck yourself.
NotAWikipedian.
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4876
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1267 times
- Been thanked: 1996 times
Re: Their administrators are inactive: Can't unlock new memb
CrowsNest wrote::roll:
Go fuck yourself.
lol