WP:NOCOMMIES Haha, this is very clever

[SkepticalHistorian]

Some very talented, clever person posted an essay, WP:NOCOMMIES and started commentary on MJPANTS talk page. It was speedily deleted. A parody of his NO:NAZIS essay.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... :NOCOMMIES

[SkepticalHistorian]

After looking at the edit history it was the very talented MJPANTS who made the artistic edits.

[Jake Is A Sellout]

@Leroy08: Wow you're missing the entire point of WP:NONAZIS, which is that ideas that discriminate on the basis of sex/gender/race/religion/gender identity are not welcome on Wikipedia. It is not a rebuke of specific political policies, as your WP:NOCOMMIES does to communism and several other political theories. Nazism is not a political theory, it is a hateful, bigoted, and violent ideology. I detest the comparisons you draw between it and communism. Not sure how you go about getting essays deleted, but I think this one should be. ––FormalDude talk 18:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

It's a good job Wikipedia is being written by historians, not absolute fuckwits, eh?

Maybe they should reflect on the fact that both the Nazis and the Communists would have readily executed anyone who self identifies as a Wikipedia editor. Not for any high minded reason like their intent to disseminate information the state considers dangerous, but simply because neither regimes particularly valued the lives of utter retards.

[SkepticalHistorian]

How would actual (former) Nazis on German Wikipedia react to the NONAZIS essay?

[ericbarbour]

and what does it say at the top?

This page in a nutshell: Racists (and other discriminatory groups) are inherently incompatible with Wikipedia. They will almost inevitably lack a neutral point of view and be a POV-pusher. If you think you've spotted one, see if you can find a number of supporting diffs and if so, report them straight to the incident noticeboard. Also report racist imagery on user pages on sight.

Well then, I want to report David Gerard and Guy Chapman. Because both of those old bastards have "lacked a neutral point of view and been POV-pushers" since they started on WP SEVENTEEN YEARS AGO. Gerard pushes "transhumanism" and his looney friends like Eliezer Yudkowsky or Nick Bostrom, and Guy likes to destroy neutral POV by pissing extravagantly on people he thinks are promoting "pseudo science". (When he's not writing long articles about pornstars with huge tits.) The fact that transhumanism IS a form of "pseudo science" seems lost on Wikipedia's shit patrol.

And leave us not forget "Yes. We are biased", because it leaves out a list of low weirdness that Wikipedians have been promoting openly for years--transhumanism and "singulatarianism" being only a couple. Ask them about Wikipedia's deep, deep love of video games or comic books. And why Doctor Who deserves 4,424 articles and files.

GO AHEAD, POST THIS ON AN/I. It will be removed within minutes.

[SkepticalHistorian]

MjolnirPants quit WP over “civility” issues:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1042998873

[Jake Is A Sellout]

MjolnirPants quit WP over “civility” issues:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1042998873

He's done it before. He'll be back, the big fanny. Addicts is as addicts do.

I will never understand people who can write so many words in an effort to hide their true feelings - they want to be allowed to give it, but not take it.

To use his words, fuck that noise.

People like him were NEVER SUPPOSED TO BE WIKIPEDIA EDITORS. What doesn't he get about that? The fucking moron. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The people who write it are meant to be intelligent enough to understand why Don't Be A Cunt and Don't Provoke The Nazis is always sage advice, and they're meant to have the emotional maturity and plain common sense to abide by it without fail. And if they do fail, and fail they will for they are human, then they are supposed to appreciate the inherent value to Wikipedia in being able to admit your mistake in full, and certainly without any FUCKING WHINING.

He acts as if it's a smart and intelligent man who loudly calls out a Nazi for being a Nazi. And if that man has a gun and an army behind him, then yes, it's pretty smart, because Nazis have a terrible record at winning wars for a reason, so the faster you can get them onto a battlefield so you can kick their ass, the better. But Wikipedia editors are not soldiers and they are most assuredly not an army.

He owes more than he will ever know to the bunch of absolutely corrupt fucks that infest the Wikipedia Administration these days. Without their support and protection, people like him would never make it past their first week, since it would be blindingly obvious they do not have the intelligence or the emotional maturity to be useful Wikipedia editors.

Because that's the tragic truth behind people like him and Eric Corbett and Casisanto etc. The disruption caused by their own immaturity outweighs their alleged positive contributions by a factor of ten at least. At least.