They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
User avatar
Jake Is A Sellout
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:01 am
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by Jake Is A Sellout » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:20 am

rog wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 7:59 pm
You're not... you're not in love with me, Mick, are you?

Look, it's ok if you are, and I'm not saying it could never happen between us, but you'd better bloody behave if you're coming to my mum's for Sunday roast.
I'd be nice to your mam. No way could she be to blame for you being so damaged you actually seem to see your own personal humiliation as a source of entertainment. Not that I'm into kinkshaming, like yourself, but most people have the decency not to inflict that on others in an interactive fashion.

Passive educational imagery, that's OK. Nobody would find that objectionable, unless they were properly in the closet. There are people out there who will feed this need of yours, if this is what you want. You've been pulling the pigtails of one particular person pretty hard recently, all jokes aside.

If I can see it, your new underlings can too. I don't think they're gonna like who you really are.

You know what locker rooms can be like!

User avatar
rog
Sucks Fan
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:36 am
Location: the dark and nasty regions
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by rog » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:51 am

Jake Is A Sellout wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:20 am
rog wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 7:59 pm
You're not... you're not in love with me, Mick, are you?

Look, it's ok if you are, and I'm not saying it could never happen between us, but you'd better bloody behave if you're coming to my mum's for Sunday roast.
I'd be nice to your mam.
I'm glad to hear it, Mick.

Wasn't expecting you to admit that you're in love with me, but hey it's cool, we can work thru it together. Do you eat meat?

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5136
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 2115 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:14 am

rog wrote:
Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:32 pm
paradoxes like Marek Kukula
Who? *checks wikipedia* A British astronomer and an author of works on popular science?
Seems like a decent dude, I don't get your point.
From 6 months ago:
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2024

And let's take an unhappy trip down memory lane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... MickMacNee
Do you eat meat?
Judging by his history, he likes it raw and bloody

User avatar
rog
Sucks Fan
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:36 am
Location: the dark and nasty regions
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by rog » Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:46 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 2:14 am
And let's take an unhappy trip down memory lane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... MickMacNee
Hmm. I'm beginning to have some doubts.
ArbCom wrote:MickMacNee has consistently and egregiously violated standards of collegiality and professionalism
ArbCom wrote:MickMacNee has been repeatedly sanctioned for disruptive, hostile, and uncollaborative conduct by numerous administrators. The sanctions to date have included three indefinite blocks, as well as sixteen other blocks longer than 24 hours
MickMacNee wrote:Your arrogant presumption of course is that I don't already have an account on a place like Commons. Commons is a great place because there's no real need for any rules, and those that do exist, due to their nature, well there's no real scope for admins with the type of flaws you have to exist. There's no way people who do not agree with Commons policies can get into positions where they can subvert such policies and conduct rather basic campaigns to play the man not the ball. On Commons, it's simple, if you talk shit, you're ignored. If you talk it enough, you're banned. There's no need for the sort of low-ball disreputable tactics you've employed to such great effect here to abuse a body like arbcom for your own ends, namely to invent new or ignore existing notability standards for your pet topics of interest, and see that they're followed using all the tricks of the trade made available to people like yourself, who are ironically trusted to watch out for them in ordinary editors. I am amazed to see that you don't get any scrutiny for this, even though its clearly just a basic character flaw, as you showed in other débâcles like your bizarre ideas about settlement nav templates, another case of you pretending that there's some rule here that if you talk bollocks politely enough, somehow it becomes valid opinion and should be treated equally against the opinions of someone who has policy, and more importantly simple non-vested common sense, on their side. It's a real shame that this site's biggest flaw is that it takes more effort to deal with people like you, than it does basic vandals. Yet your effect on overall quality and credibility is far worse than any vandal can ever achieve. I suppose I could get an account on Simple and start ensuring it became legitimate encyclopaedic resources regarding air crashes. Hopefully their outlook on user interactions means that when someone like yourself makes up a notability standard which doesn't equate with any other we have, or tries to so blatantly lie about what the ones we do have actually say, or tries to claim coverage in a tertiary topic specific resource like the ASN is a GNG-satisfying RS for the topic of aircrashes, or when a slack jawed fuckwit like Dave makes yet another classic ATA vote at Afd in defence of any of these idiotic ideas which offend all right minded intelligent people with their brazen illogic and general stupidity, then hopefully the people at Simple see this for what it is, and do not accept the situation that when perfectly valid criticisms of such deplorable behaviour like that are made, they are first and foremost not simply ignored by the people trusted to properly weigh debates and properly moderate such obviously disruptive and tendentious behaviour, and any tactics deployed to eliminate such opposition, such as deliberately ignoring valid points and unjustifiably whining about civility, that does occur in response to it as a way to absolve yourself of any and all adult responsibility and accountability for your deplorable actions, is itself ignored as the wikilawyer's tactic it is. I would love to think that Simple is not the sort of place where people look the other way when presented with evidence that its admins engage in smearing and ironically incivil behaviour while alleging incivility, in attempts to eliminate content opponents. You might think you're different from Dave, you might think that you practice your editing in a way an admin should, but you're two sides of the same coin. At least he's not shy in admitting that he treats Wikipedia like a game, or in showing that he probably has the same respect for our policies and guidelines where they conflict with his personal desires as he does when someone tells him he can't have an ice cream before his dinner. Wikipedia is a serious project, one that seeks to rival real, quality information sources, just not serious enough yet about dealing with people like you or Dave who couldn't get a job stacking library shelves, never mind being responsible for what goes into the books it has. It's a crying fucking shame that new editors conned into believing that we operate according to how the policies and guidelines are written, still have to be exposed to people like you. MickMacNee 14:35, 30 July 2011
Doesn't sound anything like our Crow.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5136
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 2115 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Nov 15, 2021 4:27 am

rog wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 3:46 am
Doesn't sound anything like our Crow.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Supposedly Mick is an Irish guy living in Australia. They both like to rant in similar ways.

Wikipedia brings out the worst in all kinds of people.

User avatar
Jake Is A Sellout
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:01 am
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by Jake Is A Sellout » Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:20 pm

Never confirm or deny.

Just laugh. :D

Never gets less funny.

I mean, shit, what have you actually got?

There must be something more detailed than this? You surely don't get a Global Ban for similar writing styles and vocabulary, although given recent events, now Wikipediocracy and Beeblebrox seem to have quite the working relationship, and perhaps your promotion is your reward for being a good little soldier there, maybe you do!

Maybe the giveaway is that I know words like vocabulary? Or that I take the effort to use suitably cutting insults like good little soldier that fit the precise situation and so cut deep and clean, rather than more basic stuff.

Crudity of thought and speech being quite common on Wikipediocracy, naturally. Gross. One wonders who it would appeal to. Not Andreas or I. Two extremes of a spectrum you would have hoped Wikipediocracy could appeal to, given their stated mission.

And yet it appeals to neither. Not even a little bit.

Shall we waste our time even asking Andreas if picking a person like you as a Mod makes him any less convinced that forum is not for him?

THAT HE WOULD PREFER TO WORK WITH YOUR SWORN ENEMIES, ON ENEMY TURF, with their small bones and small bats.

I see the attraction, given the alternative.

I'll keep saying it, you cowards can keep pretending like you don't even hear it.

This is how I hydrate. 8-)

Deny it. Say you don't care. Go on. Show the world what little backbone you really have. What little belief you have in what you say and do.

Show the world you're the perfect Mod for a forum which long ago dropped all pretence that it was a serious place for serious work.

Come on now, reveal your truth. Don't force me to be cruel. Don't make me beat it out of you. We know how you bruise.

:deadbanana:

Anyway, to business. Minor cruelty. Standard stuff. To exploit your stupidity for my personal gain....

If having intellect, talent and culture, is what marks me out from the Wikipedia masses......

.....SIGN ME UP. :D

I am a serious Wikipedia critic, so I will always be looking for ways to demonstrate that Wikipedia editors are ineligible for the role they seek, and those who seek to keep them there, by for example aiding and abetting them in their cult ways, really do deserve the worst in life.

All be it, I like that you know how to use colours!

Doesn't particularly appeal to me, but then again, I'm not six years old!

And I like the hard truth that white on black conveys. A written hate crime, if you will.

(wonders out loud if there's a file on Wikipedia somewhere that lists all the users who like to use use colour, or color, for emphasis).

Fuck off off this bullshit man. Like anyone would think you were a catch!

:roll:

Talentless fuckwit.

I await, as ever, the next opportunity, you low grade Jester.

Fuck me if people never seem to understand what I am or what I do. :shrug:

So be it!

Feed the beast! For the beast is always hungry!

:twisted:

:flamingbanana:

User avatar
rog
Sucks Fan
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:36 am
Location: the dark and nasty regions
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: They made Smilley/Hillbillyholliday a moderator! And other hillarious fanmaill.

Post by rog » Mon Nov 15, 2021 4:43 pm

Mick, I told you before about the double Ls
mickmacnee wrote:usefull, willfull, &c.
WO CrowsNest wrote:compell
And two dozen or so other idiosyncracies. Beans and all.

And you're both Tynesiders of course.

I've always been intrigued by your relationship with another incredibly angry Wikipedian from Newcastle. That spy who infiltrated the IRA and got shot six times for his Troubles. He borrowed one of your bus pictures for his war on the government, and you wrote an article about his film. What's going on there, Mick?

Image

https://www.flickr.com/photos/martinmcg ... toW-5CJWuD
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... gent_Carol
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =239369788

But this is all off topic, apollogies.

User avatar
rog
Sucks Fan
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:36 am
Location: the dark and nasty regions
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by rog » Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:20 pm

Jake Is A Sellout wrote:
Mon Nov 15, 2021 1:20 pm
All be it, I like that you know how to use colours!

Doesn't particularly appeal to me, but then again, I'm not six years old!
:D 8-) :deadbanana: :D :roll: :shrug: :twisted: :flamingbanana: :ugeek: :oops: :lol: :(



I 🧡 U

:smiley:
Last edited by rog on Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jake Is A Sellout
Sucks Warrior
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2021 1:01 am
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by Jake Is A Sellout » Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:27 pm

Neither confirm or deny!

:D

Not that I recall ever telling anyone I hail from Tyneside.

You getting ahead of yourself here, Agent Dipshit?

All be it, who would go to the Trouble of making people think you were from one place, if you were really from another?

That's just sillly.

:lol:

User avatar
rog
Sucks Fan
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 7:36 am
Location: the dark and nasty regions
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: They made Smiley/Hillbillyholiday a moderator! And other hilarious fanmail.

Post by rog » Mon Nov 15, 2021 5:38 pm

Neither confirm or deny!
You know who else used to say that sort of thing?

That Karting Wikipedian chap from WR who was a British nationalist and thought MickMacNee was absolutely hilarious.
TheKartingWikipedian wrote:
My policy is never to confirm or deny the existence or otherwise of a sock.

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37942
TheKartingWikipedian wrote:
Mick really is back now:

Mick's view of the world

Bloody funny stuff, if you can be bothered reading it

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37402
Could be a coincidence, I suppose. What do I know?

Post Reply