Doxxing on WPO

[WikiWikiWow]

In a thread criticizing a WP Admin, Valereee, one of the WPO regulars decided to doxx her, revealing that he knows her age, location, interests and even where she shops and what she buys (?!!). Valereee creates an account and calls them out on it.

https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=14092
https://archive.ph/eZn3p

Will they "circle the wagons" and protect one of their own, like one would expect from a den of misanthopic trolls? Maybe they surprise us, but I'm not holding my breath.

[badmachine]

idk doxing is a pretty strong word for what s/he/they did there. but Valereee seems to think thats what it is:

This behavior is a threat to my real-world safety.

If you’d like, I can take it to the farms.

... or take it to here. :^)

[ericbarbour]

... or take it to here. :^)

Yes. Here, he can abuse bad WP insiders at will--without a bunch of SIMPERING FUCKHEADS criticizing him. And probably stabbing him in the back to Wee Billy and Jake. Fuck this little shit:

ScotFinnRadish wrote:
If this forum is going to allow partial doxing based on Vigilant's disagreement with an admin action, can we at least keep it off google? This has nothing to do with the action, doesn't demonstrate a COI or that they're hiding something. It's just needlessly shitty, but I guess he needs something to do when he's not getting successfully trolled by a minor.

But he won't move over here. Because he has an audience of current and former insiders over there. Must like the feeling of a knife in his back?

Whatever. No one will listen to him and Valereee will keep on being an abusive patroller, banning people for trivial shit. Eventually, in a few years, she will be dragged to Arbcom and the SIMPERING FUCKHEADS will go, "gee, we should do something about this". Long after it is too late.

Yngvadottir said:
I've argued elsewhere on this forum—badly—that reputation is important on Wikipedia. Wikipedia should be a meritocracy, or more precisely, a place where trust—as opposed to the initial blind faith of "Assume Good Faith"—is rooted in someone's record of actions.

Well, IT'S NOT LIKE THAT. You little turd. And you KNOW damn well it isn't.

AndyTheGrump said:
Vigilant, you are scum.

Andy, you're a different variety of scum.

Vig is correct, it's too late, she is easily doxxed and was doxxed here. FIVE YEARS AGO. Although I doubt putting her on Kiwi Farms will result in much of anything--a female WP admin in her 60s isn't "lolcow-zy" enough for their demented amusement.

"Encyclopedia" my ass.

[ericbarbour]

Reposting the early archive of the thread (because I expect Wee Billy will destroy it).

https://archive.ph/eZn3p

If those little putzes are soooo angry about Vigilant taking swipes at them, and about the doxery of their little friends, why aren't they here calling out the Bird for doing exactly that? Oh, right, they will receive a much more hostile reception on THIS forum. Oops.

[WikiWikiWow]

The thread received around 10 more replies before being moved to the private area.