Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 8:49 am

WhoReallyCares wrote:Round 7: conclusion
In an explosive response, the mighty CrowsNest has delivered a pair of astonishing five-punch combinations, both of which culminated in ferocious left hooks.

The great fighter notes: "A blithe reference to total article count and byte size as a measure of success is almost laughable in its naivety". This is completely true. Surely an encyclopedia ought to value quality over quantity. But if Wikipedia does value quality, why is there no quality control? CN may remember that Eric "Ferret Fucker" Corbett made exactly the same observation here on WPO a short while ago.

CN's second left hook was magnificent: "and I absolutely did laugh at the claim vandalism is now so rare it is newsworthy". He's right, and we all know it. Vandalism is everywhere. It occurs every second of every minute of every hour, throughout the entire day.

Great performance by CN, and he gets the round.

It's now Randy 5; CN 2.
Last edited by Graaf Statler on Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 8:55 am

Randy from Boise wrote:couple more rounds and I can go rope-a-dope.

Actually, I think we're about finished. I need to defend WPO's approach vs. the WikiReview-I/Sucks approach, but I'm pretty much out if they don't keep the thread in one place and if CN's crew jumps in to fight his fight with him.

t
Last edited by Graaf Statler on Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:26 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 8:56 am

WhoReallyCares wrote:Awesome. You are da man. But don't underestimate the mighty CN.

Did you know that George Foreman later admitted to cheating? During rope-a-dope he thumped Ali savagely on the neck, which some believe may have contributed to Parkinson's disease.

Cool reply to Quixote's squire.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:07 am

Graaf Statler wrote:
WhoReallyCares wrote:A somewhat overzealous Dutch fan has made his way into the ring. He's shouting and screaming at Tim, and demanding answers. He states that if no answers are forthcoming, Tim will be disqualified.

IMO, the WS forum needs to tighten ringside security. These interruptions are most unseemly.

I stayed out of the discussion till Tim came up with Oh, now I see why one prominent anti-WP Nederlander likes you so much! And a shit story WMF is legal untouchable because they never lost a law case. That was a sophism, and hands of of the referee. I stay out of this debate as long the gladiators leave me alone, WRC. And for the rest, I am not involved.
Last edited by Graaf Statler on Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 9:28 am

Graaf Statler wrote:
Randy from Boise wrote:
A couple more rounds and I can go rope-a-dope.

Actually, I think we're about finished. I need to defend WPO's approach vs. the WikiReview-I/Sucks approach, but I'm pretty much out if they don't keep the thread in one place and if CN's crew jumps in to fight his fight with him.

t

I told you what my point was. Leave me out of your debate, but anyway I should like to hear your answer, Tim. Till that time you have lost for me any debate.
And the thread is at one place, just like the commons. You did't hire complete WS Tim, a spin of is not any problem, (and a bit of chaos also not.)
You and crow have only that topic for yourself, and the place is now yours.

Anyway, you lost the last round so it is time to focus you on the next one, Tim.

And now:

Round 8


PS I made a few mistakes when I copied the topic from WO, please notify me if there are still any mistakes.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Oct 28, 2018 11:34 am

WhoReallyCares wrote:CN may remember that Eric "Ferret Fucker" Corbett made exactly the same observation here on WPO a short while ago.
Not only do I remember it, I fucking destroyed him for it.

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 6717#p6717

That's why the ferret fucker is terrified of this place, but finds a warm cosy nest at Wikipediocracy, finding common cause with Kumioko et al (who surely needs hospital treatment himself for the daily beatings he's being handed by a veritable who's who of Wikipedia power players). They need to bench him for their own good, or the laughter from Wikipedia HQ will distract them from their noble cause of......whatever it is......entirely.

People don't seem to understand, this isn't even me out of first gear. I can laugh at Kumioko and those who let him do what he wants like an unrestrained child, stomp on Eric's head for being his usual Eric self, deal with Carrite's attempts to rationalise his existence, and still find plenty of time to do some solid Wikipedia criticism. Our mission is to show how Wikipedia sucks, and it's critics. Mission accomplished for this week, yet again, despite the distraction of this non-contest.

By contrast, Carrite hasn't posted to the public area of Wikipeidocracy, or made a single Wikipedia edit, since Friday afternoon. And yet we know from his postings here, and in their private forum, this isn't because he hasn't had the time, or hasn't been thinking about this supposed boxing match.

If this is meant to be me in a boxing match, I think I win by default, even if I do say so myself (I only do so since it appears talking up one's own game seems to be considered acceptable by my so called opponent - we Brits don't tend to do that ordinarily). Carrite is punching his little heart out, I'm barely noticing the displaced air.

If people must use boxing analogies, then seriously, recognise a Champion when you see one. The guy plans to defend Wikipediocracy in his next attack. Suicide move. Does he seriously not know what my specialist subject even is? If this guy is the best they've got, shut that place down now, it's sending lambs to do lion's work. I don't want to hurt him, but I will. We're talking about a guy who put me on ignore for this.....
Other than the fungus like presence of Wikipedia, what's axiomatic about anything you said above? How would you even come to know Google's business strategy? It's sheer guesswork, born of a misguided perception of Wikipedia. The sad reality is, you have to believe this stuff, otherwise your years spent on the scribble pad were a complete waste.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

We're dealing with a guy who can't even handle me in second gear, mildly irritated by his usual proletarising and self-reinforcement, which is what that was. He's gets credit for being one of the last of their snowflake brigade to cut and run, but it is what it is regardless.

The themes in the run up to that comment were familiar.....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 30#p215830

....and the last thing you need to be doing in a boxing match, is doing the same thing you've always done. A recipe for disaster.

This one trick pony knows I am an aggressive but versatile fighter, or at least he should do. There's a long line of battered bodies out there who made the mistake of not knowing who I am or what I know, trying to pull Wikipedian basic bitch moves on seasoned prize fighters. Wikipediocracy has become somewhat of a rest home for them, a place of safety, courtesy of Nurse Jake. Although for mainlining the morphine, this time around Rogol had to take refuge with Auggie in his establishment. Even he looks on from afar at this so called battle with the terrified fascination of a defeated opponent, whilst claiming disinterest. He must fear he won't even get the consolation prize of a bout with Carrite for second place.

Carrite recently claimed I was ignorant of American football. In reality, I'm an avid Raiders fan. There's something about a mental fanbase who love to strike fear in the opposition tribe, a coach who recognises the individual talent for evil in his players and gives them free reign, and an organisation that readily ascribes to cheating when your opponent is the establishment and their little darlings, that really appeals. You feel me?

I'm the 300lb linebacker with metal bars in my illegal arm pads, looking to land a forearm on Carrite, the streak of piss wide receiver who just caught a panicked two yard pass from a Quarterback whose ribs you can already hear cracking. In that split second, he actually thinks he's going to make a play. He thinks he can see the goal line. Then reality hits.

I mean, seriously....
Randy from Boise wrote:You also forget to mention that Don Quixote de la Mancha started a retaliatory thread under my real name because I was mopping the ring with his fat keister... He's a poser and a pussy.
t
Carrite wrote:Ha ha, you've exposed me, dragonslayer!

Time to go jump off a bridge, I have nothing more to live for.

What's the matter, you fake-ass pussy? Still have a bloody nose???

xoxo,


tim

For the benefit of the spectators, who always want to know the back stories of the opponents (although arguably only of the Gladiators, not their training fodder), I took five minutes out of my day to address the weakness of his foundational beliefs, just to see if he could handle it. I literally said, "Let's hope he can handle it." Again, just second gear stuff, a mild workout, no more. Evidently he cannot.

If he's not pissing blood already, he soon will be.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Sun Oct 28, 2018 12:56 pm

Anyway, to stay in boxing terms, I hope Randy from now on understand that a attack on the referee in his roll as arbiter, or his on neutrality is a dead sinn in a boxing match and also in a debate.

Let's move to round 8, your turn Randy. Or do you give up now?

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:02 am

Poetlister wrote:
WhoReallyCares wrote:
CN's second left hook was magnificent: "and I absolutely did laugh at the claim vandalism is now so rare it is newsworthy".



Poetlister wrote:
Whether it's newsworthy or not, it does make news, as I prove every week.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:04 am

No Ledge wrote:
The vandalism that the media notice is given undue weight. Because a bot monitors all IP edits from the US Congress, a spotlight shines on all vandalism committed there, even though it's reverted so fast that nobody except a bot would notice it.

Meanwhile in the deeper recesses of Wikipedia, vandalism goes undetected and unreverted for weeks or months, until I get around to clearing a maintenance category that detects it... a maintenance category that seemingly nobody else patrols.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:19 am

Wel, I have the impression Tim Boise has left the arena, but we will see. Not a strong performance, Tim lost the last round and knew he was in the jungle, he wanted to replace Jake, it was his initiative. He knew where he stepped in. And I think he was not treaded unfair.

But Sucks isn't the save Wikipediocrazy surrounding where is always uncle Jake or a other sysop to help you to push your pro Wikipedia POV or to help you out. You are on your own, you have to fight your own way through the jungle.

But still I hope Tim is coming up with something what surprise us all, something spectacular, a briljant move. But from my personal experience I know at the moment the discussion is about the realty gap of the European legalisation (Because that was the breaking point.) it is the end of every discussion with any die hard Wikipediaen. Tim Boise is not a exception.

Post Reply