Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats blecch!
User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:00 pm

Randy from Boise wrote:WhoReallyCares wrote:
CN's second left hook was magnificent: "and I absolutely did laugh at the claim vandalism is now so rare it is newsworthy".

Poetlister wrote:
Whether it's newsworthy or not, it does make news, as I prove every week.

....My basic point being that if it was as ubiquitous as some would have it, it would NOT be newsworthy but would be an expected thing.

Wikipedia has cache with the general public and with the news media and is not melting down into an incoherent mass of falsehood and vandalism, as the Hasten the Day folk like Mr. CN would have it.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:08 am

WhoReallyCares wrote:
Analysis: possible disqualification


Randy "bonecrusher" Boise wrote:

You also forget to mention that Don Quixote de la Mancha started a retaliatory thread under my real name because I was mopping the ring with his fat keister... He's a poser and a pussy.


WhoReallyCares wrote:

I didn't know what Tim meant at first, but see now what's going on. Back in May CN started a thread about Tim, using his real name rather than his Wikipedia username. The thread was dormant for almost six months, but on Saturday CN resurrected it to insult and malign Tim ...... immediately after getting his arse kicked in rounds five and six. Here's the thread [note how it was inactive from May 1 until Saturday October 27]:

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... f=10&t=600

This is all wrong. Why would CN stoop to insulting Tim behind his back? Why could he not have addressed his comments to Tim while the two of them were in the ring together?

IMO this is grounds for possible disqualification. It's not only quite low, it's also rather gay and pretty much the sort of behavior we'd expect from Wikipedians. If Tim agrees this warrants disqualification, we can ask Jake to close and lock this thread. We MUST remember that Tim "cast iron" Carrite had the balls to head over to WS to participate in this fight. It is unacceptable that he's being insulted elsewhere on that forum, especially after taking the lead in such dramatic style in rounds five and six.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:22 am

Graaf Statler wrote:Randy took the place of Jake and knew where he stepped in, WRC. Randy didn't hire complete sucks and has only that topic for the battle at his service,

Randy is in my opinion a tremendous coward by leaving the arena now after he lost the last round. Boxers always look each other in deep eyes, and insult each other, that is a part of the game. It is a shit argument to leave the ring and he himself is insulting too.

There is not any reason for disqualification, but I ask Crow to wait the next time till the game is over with commons elsewhere on sucks except in this two topics. If Randy didn't just run away before the 15 rounds are finishend
Last edited by Graaf Statler on Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:03 am, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:27 am

Randy from Boise wrote:I do have one more speech to make over there about how WPO's approach is right and Sucks' approach is wrong, but I've been busy and, well, Crow's Nest needs to fuck off, to coin a phrase.

t

That is not the apointment, mister Randy. 15 rounds was the apointment, and than you can speech whatever you want.

Or you speech now, and leave the arena, but that is absolute the coward way.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 11:57 am

WhoReallyCares wrote:

Randy from Boise wrote:
I do have one more speech to make over there about how WPO's approach is right and Sucks' approach is wrong, but I've been busy and, well, Crow's Nest needs to fuck off, to coin a phrase.


WhoReallyCares wrote:
All good. One more round and it's a wrap.

CN has a duty to remember you're his guest. He ought to show a bit of respect or at least acknowledge you're not one of the "Cowards of Wikipediocracy" he refers to. He certainly can't go cunting you off behind your back every time he's losing. That's just lame. If you've got points to make, make 'em in the fucking ring.


Graaf Statler' wrote:All right, colleague referee.

One clean round, and than we are finishend. We follow your rules (WRC) in this last round. No interventions of others, no insults on other places both on WO and WS, and that the best may win! And you make at the end a summery and analyse.

And Tim, take your time and be well prepared, and than you are both hero's for me! And I think not only for me!


And here a little warming up from our Dutch hero Rico Verhoeven to amuse the audience in the time Tim is preparing himself. How will be the new wiki-Rico Verhoeven? Crow? Randy?
We will see after this round!

By the way, this guy is far from stupide, he has a university degree English and a well running business.


[youtube_url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZJJdpvcKqQ[/youtube_url]

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:19 pm

WRC has either lost it, or has been bribed. Has Jake promised he won't get banned from Wikipediocracy if he becomes an unashamed cheerleader of their dilletantes?

Nothing was done behind his back, it was posted in the open forum in a thread under his own name. He was aware of the thread, I'd linked to it earlier in the bout before updating it, although I suspect he was merely feigning ignorance of its existence before then. He is certainly feigning offence at me using his real name, which he makes no effort to hide on Wikipedia and uses regularly elsewhere when signing as 'tim'. That is the mark of a real Wikipedian there.

Even if he wasn't open about his real name, he knows this place is the real hate site, not Wikipediocracy, so he knows we practice a policy of justified outing. He is abusing Wikipedia to advance himself own interests, so if he was hiding his real name, we would expose it. But he does not hide it.

He's shameless, unafraid of anyone in the real world knowing what he does there, which is the defining trait of all True Believer Wikipedians. It's no accident these people are usually set in their ways retirees, or people whose careers have hit a dead end. People with nothing to lose, massively attracted by the prospect of Wikipedia giving them power and influence they can't obtain elsewhere. It's no accident that Drmies, Doc James, Corbett, Ritchie, Cullen, Dennis Brown and Timbo, are all middle aged white dudes who fall into this camp.

I'm not wasting solid criticism like that demolition of "Timbo's Rules" on a thread no general reader would be interested in, I'll put it in the thread created for the purposes of documenting a prominent Wikipedicrat and Wikipedian, albeit being a cossetted member of the former, while having zero power or status in the latter, only an imagined glacial effect on the subconscious of his peers. Unlike Wikipediocracy, we are always mindful of our mission, we exist to expose these people, Wikipedian or Wikipediocrat, not that there is much to differentiate the two species.

He's no guest here, he's entitled to no special treatment. This isn't Wikipediocracy, we don't do special treatment. He's being treated no differently to the way anyone else is here, and certainly no differently to how someone coming here saying the things he says would be. Would be get banned from Wikipediocracy for proletiising, ignoring what I say where it is convenient to do so, and calling me a pussy? No. Would Sashi/Dysklyver/Graaf get banned for the same? Yes. I got banned for far less. I got banned for making snowflakes like Tim feel sad by merely telling the truth about Wikipedia and their part in it. They can't handle it.

He certainly gets no credit for joining a thread where combat is expected, then taking a knee for an extended period of time while he presumably gets assistance in coming up with something to say that shows "WPO's approach is right and Sucks' approach is wrong", certainly something I haven't heard already and demolished.

He knows he made a mistake coming here with nothing but his usual mantras and the ever present underestimation of me that seems to characterise the pseudo-critics that call Wikipediocracy home. You can be a coward and a fool at the same time. The likes of Ming must be laughing at Tim, they wouldn't even make the mistake of coming here after they saw they were easily bested by me even in the rigged environment of Wikipediocracy. So let's call it admirable stupidity, nothing more.

If he was a serious critic, if he was a force to be reckoned with at all, he would have at least ten solid reasons why "WPO's approach is right and Sucks' approach is wrong" already in the locker ready to go. I could write the reverse list in an hour. Much of it has already been said on here before, unanswered by the jokers over the road, but I can include a few examples from this match, to further prove my point.

Timmy doesn't seem to understand that the time for trash talk is before the fight. You don't stop midway through the fight and say "I'm busy" and his opponent "needs to fuck off". Gloves up, Timmy. Protect yourself or concede, or I will happily fuck you up as a defenceless but still nominally standing opponent.

You've clearly been dazed and frightened by what you've seen of me getting barely out of first gear. Everyone is busy Tim, yet you have surely noticed this mild exertion has barely knocked me off my usual pace, with solid Wikipedia criticism dropping left, right and centre. It's pretty much business as usual in this corner, while you seemingly struggle to stem the bleeding and play for time.

For the record, I don't recall even agreeing to this fight even happening, he's the one who came here looking to start it. But I am no coward. I happily accepted the challenge and the published rules. I'll happily finish it too, and I am unimpressed at the decision that the rules have now been changed to his benefit - someone with his limited abilities and experience of course wants the fight to be curtailed to eight or nine rounds, rather than the expected fifteen.

There's only one pussy here. He disqualified himself by being himself - a Wikipedian to the core.

Bring me a real competitor. The ferret fucker surely thinks he can stand at least a couple of rounds with such a biased referee, no?

Whassa matter? CHICKEN?

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:30 pm

CrowsNest wrote:.........he knows this place is the real hate site, not Wikipediocracy, so he knows we practice a policy of justified outing. He is abusing Wikipedia to advance himself own interests, so if he was hiding his real name, we would expose it. But he does not hide it.

This is correct. I hate every centimeter of Wikipedia for what it has done to people. Not the people, the Wikipedians themself.

Wikipedia heeft jullie allemaal in ordinaire brievenbuspissers veranderd.

And you all may find out yourself what that means....... One hint, een brievenbuspisser is someone who is pissing in someones mailbox.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:46 pm

CrowsNest wrote:There's only one pussy here. He disqualified himself by being himself - a Wikipedian to the core.

You are complete right, because in my opinion if you step in a ring you have to fight all 15 rounds, but it should be a waste to leave this final last round.
And, I think if we ever organize such a competition again, (Jimmy is my dream candidate) I should go for 10 rounds, because 15 is to much.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by Graaf Statler » Thu Nov 01, 2018 10:09 am

We all are waiting for you here Randy. Where are you, or did you leave the arena? I think it is polite at least to tell us that.

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Randy from Boise: Rumble in the Jungle

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:35 pm

He's a Wikipedian. This is how they roll, their version of a tactical withdrawal when getting their ass kicked. Just let him be. I'll simply add this disappearing act to the things I can say when he tries to claim me using "Wikipedian" as a pejorative is not justified.

Post Reply