Madam gender wrote:Maybe this is why the WMF does not publish the reasons for its global bans – they might have to think about compensation. In the meantime, no one knows how many of these are pedophiles, or even what you have to do to get yourself globally banned. And while some of those banned do not care if people think they are pedophiles, others do care. Still others may not realize this is what people – including potential employers – will be secretly thinking about them when there is no publicly identifiable reason for a ban.
Source
WMF tries to make clear on that page the one who is on that list did something unforgivable. Something terrible, It's a short list, there are millions of Wikipedia users, so someone must have done something terrible! They are talking about a WMF Global Ban Policy, harassment, office actions, there is or was even a experienced Manager Trust & Safety. With a high salary, so it must be someone with high qualifications. He is even promoted to Twitter, even with a 20% higher salary. This man must be a professional, that is the message. What a lost for WMF! How can we replace this James.
That is the sign.
It looks all dammed reliable and solide, it is a serous matter and for sure people start to speculate, is he a N*azi? Or a pedo? And other nasty things.
Well, I think it is not necessary that I, a member of a murdered jewish family am not a n*azi and I told it before, if a nice lady under the let's say 35 years ask me to have a lot of fun in bed my proposal will be lets drink a cup of coffee together with some cake in a nice theeroom. And to be honest seen my age I don't know if I don't prefer the same with a nice looking lady over 35 years, it should give me absolute the same joy.
So, in short, any speculation about me is complete rediciles, just like that complete Global Ban because I did nothing wrong. i am a member of a established and respected Dutch family and a decent civilian, I was a good editor, it is a huge insult of WMF.
AndrewForson introduced the term gaslighting here.
Stephanie A. Sarkis wrote:Gaslighting is a manipulation tactic used to gain power. And it works too well.
Madam Sarkis is of course complete right, it works perfect. It is just one of the many gaslighting tactics of the wiki community and WMF. You followed them too blind, madam. Because your evil sister told you so. I was a psycho according you, you send me even a mail with adresses where I could help for my "psychiatric problem", I am to hard to follow, my English is too poor to express myself, all gaslighting. Even the not giving a reasonably answer or explanation of WMF is gaslighting, because people start to speculate.
A SanFanBan is the Daisy Cutter under the gaslighting technics. If there is nothing else left it's the last option. It's the cocaïne under the gaslighting trolling.
And what do you think, should the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation already has her bag back form that terrible Lufthansa? With here teddybear in it so she can sleep again? And what is here next trip? Is she doing anything, anything to stop this gaslighting? No, she stimulates and support it. She travels all over the world to promote Wikipedia with all it's bad as the solution of every problem, what is of course complete crap. What she must know. She is not there to lead here organisation or to intervent when things went wrong, although that should be here job where she is paid for.
But she is a woman, so she is a great director, just having a pussy will do. Just like it is ok to beat with two big tits, but if a man does the same with his penis o, o, o, wat a scandal. Tits beating is extreem populair on WP at the moment.
Well, remember dear gender lady, a man has just one penis, many times small what give many complexes, but many of that wiki lady's have two big tits. So in fact we are the one who need protection. There are still a lot of gender gaps to solve on wikipedia, madam.
In short, fuck of with your gender nonsens, a gender problems is a culture thing what have very little to do with fact if someone is a man or a woman. A nasty or incompetent woman is just as bad as a nasty incompetent man. A shitty woman is niet meer, to borrow Wikimedia-nl's slogan of this year. The wiki gender approach is one of the reasons for this kind of excess, female is good, male is bad. Come on girls, beat as hard as you can with your two tits, and every wiki probelm will be solved. We will learn that mankind a lesson!
Jezus, what a sick and unhealthy crap is wikipedia!