The (new, straight-from-scratch) Trump thread

[Bbb23sucks]

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65852062

[Bbb23sucks]

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65852062

He showed up, posted bond, and went back on the campaign trail.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/24/opin ... rikes.html
And appears to be succeeding.
https://apnews.com/article/2024-republi ... 8d49f9a3cd

Remember: our fellow Americans are going on Tiktok, and telling each other.....to eat borax. This is how smart average Americans can be. So they probably deserve the "leadership" of Tha Donald.
https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/07/ ... cepalming/

[journo]

Made an article on Trump. Didn't spend much time on it.

But it manages to only have 3 paragraphs in the lede instead of Wikipedias 9 lede paragraphs

https://wiki.leftypol.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

[journo]

Nevermind, lede was just expanded into 5 paragraphs by the site admins, which is fine, their decision

[badmachine]

Categories: Pages with script errors All articles with unsourced statements Articles with hatnote templates targeting a nonexistent page

looks like it was scraped from wikipedia tbqh

Presidents of the United States US Republican Party Far-right politics in the United States 1946 births Neofascism

hm, a wikipedia fork with the same politics as wikipedia sounds pointless. i will say this older revision is better than what's there now: link

(edited)

[Bbb23sucks]

Categories: Pages with script errors All articles with unsourced statements Articles with hatnote templates targeting a nonexistent page

looks like it was scraped from wikipedia tbqh

Presidents of the United States US Republican Party Far-right politics in the United States 1946 births Neofascism

hm, a wikipedia fork with the same politics as wikipedia sounds pointless. i will say this older revision is better than what's there now: link

(edited)

How is it "the same politics as Wikipedia"? Wikipedia has extreme liberal bias. Sure, they'll condemn Trump, but almost never for his action. Certainly never for meaningful ones.

This is a wiki run by leftists, not by people who condemn every media outlet that isn't liberal as "extremist".

[badmachine]

Categories: Pages with script errors All articles with unsourced statements Articles with hatnote templates targeting a nonexistent page

looks like it was scraped from wikipedia tbqh

Presidents of the United States US Republican Party Far-right politics in the United States 1946 births Neofascism

hm, a wikipedia fork with the same politics as wikipedia sounds pointless. i will say this older revision is better than what's there now: link

(edited)

How is it "the same politics as Wikipedia"? Wikipedia has extreme liberal bias. Sure, they'll condemn Trump, but almost never for his action. Certainly never for meaningful ones.

This is a wiki run by leftists, not by people who condemn every media outlet that isn't liberal as "extremist".

i stand corrected

[journo]

this older revision is better than what's there now: [url=http://wiki.76i2c3hn55fcj5nut3tqlboqqbb ... nald_Trump&

That was my writing before the leftypol wiki people started adding stuff. Some of their additions were good. But they seem to want to just pack the article with Wikipedia stuff as you mentioned. I don't know why people start independent wikis just to add Wikipedia stuff, that's not even the point of independent wikis.

[journo]

Trump is now leading in 5 out of 6 battleground states according to most recent polling

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/05/us/p ... -poll.html

Obama-ite king-makers, including David Axelrod, are not-so-subtly suggesting Biden drop out, and that a decision to continue to run would be prioritizing selfish interests over the country.

[ericbarbour]

Obama-ite king-makers, including David Axelrod, are not-so-subtly suggesting Biden drop out, and that a decision to continue to run would be prioritizing selfish interests over the country.

Won't happen. Joe will take everything down with him, if it suits his ego, no different from Tha Donald.

It is part of why the 2024 election will be extremely close and impossible to predict: the voting public sees two narcissistic old men sniping at each other. One is a pseudo-liberal (Biden has a long well-documented history of being pro-business and law-and-order) and the other is a pseudo-conservative (Trump was quick to execute federal death-row prisoners and knows how to trigger angry fat white men, but really DGAF about a number of current conservative "doctrines", like abortion and vaccines). Eeny-meeny-miney-moe.