https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1042247618
I honestly wonder how many of the participants in that discussion even realise that in that very same week, Beeblebrox had gone to a Commons debate with the sole intent of mocking Fae, gloated in an offsite forum known for doxxing Wikipedians that he had done so, expressed glee at the knowledge Fae could see this gloating, and once the Commons community had shown its unwillingness to see this as any kind of a problem, proceed to personally attack Fae on with Commons and Wikipedia, using terms like "toxic personality".
Beeblebrox won't care, but research has already proven what common sense dictates is just obvious anyway - it's not just targetted harassment that persuades women to leave Wikipedia, its seeing the near constant drumbeat of background toxic masculinity like that go unpunished, especially when it's being done by the powerful against the powerless.
Beeblebrox has recently claimed he doesn't even read these threads. And maybe he doesn't. Maybe he thinks his position is that secure, in a place like Wikipedia, with its woeful record of doing anything serious about harassment, that he doesn't need to.
He did, after all, not bother to even read portions of Fae's complaints, and referred to the rest in dismissive terms, like "blah blah". And when all was said and done, he hadn't actually apologised for anything, and had rather bizarrely tried to claim it was somehow Fae who had made him launch this unprovoked attack, which saw him import entirely irrelevant history from an entirely irrelevant project, and comment on entirely irrelevant images of Fae in a state of undress.
All the stuff that would make a woman feel safe and secure, right?
