View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Nov 13, 2018 6:19 pm




Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
The cowards of Wikipediocracy 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 978
Reply with quote
To be honest, I think they did a experiment, but it didn't work out because it became the place to be for complete wiki fools. A space where they were as free as on wikipedia, and a place what was safe for them to tell as much wikishit as they wanted. And because Jack gave me in a very friendly way acces without any restrictions, (only some useful advice), I am shur it wasn't what they wanted because in that way there critical forum had changed in one big joke! It was the Village pump in the square at the end, yes really it was, and was no place anymore for any critic.

But lets look forward, and what your role was is hard to say Crow, although I am sure you played a roll in that proces. But that doesn't have to be negative, it can als be a eyeopener. Anyway, I prefer myself to criticise in a other style in the future, but I like your hard way style too.

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Fri Jul 13, 2018 4:43 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:56 pm
Posts: 264
Reply with quote
CrowsNest wrote:
[...] one of the main purposes of this board is to point out why many Wikipedia critics suck [...].

Thanks for the explanation.


Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:27 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am
Posts: 978
Reply with quote
OK, lets end this endless discussion. But I think we must start to criticise the wiki system in a more technical way. Because, many people, users have no idea of the structures of WMF. Have no idea of the rather strange functioning of the European politic. Don't know there doesn't exist a European copyright law.
Have no idea how Arbcom is working, with no hear and be heard. People simply don't know! They don't know all the dirty games, they don't know about the astroturfing, the dirty stewards on Meta, the SanFanBan given by the most poor sysop ever, I love cheeseburgers James Alexander.

We must tell them about the tower of Babylon WMF, with a complete incompetent staf. But maybe, maybe, we must indeed change a bit our tune. I mean, as a advice, not as a rule. Leaving a bit our personal frustration behind us. Not at once, but with baby steps....

_________________
Mijn blog. (In Dutch) of kom eens gezellig bij de Kolonel langs in Eerbeek.
En kijk eens hier, het "Verboden" lijstje van door mij aangemaakte artiklen.

. Image
.Winner of
The SanBan


Fri Jul 13, 2018 10:33 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 1401
Reply with quote
AndyTheGrump wrote:
This is a website dedicated to criticism and analysis of Wikipedia. It is not a therapy site for Wikipedia rejects to engage in infantile whining on.
Look at this crap. He seems to think people can't see that in his case, this is just empty grandstanding, a pathetic attempt to justify yet another case of him showing on Wikipediocracy, with their full endorsement, that he is way more of a Wikipedian than he has ever been a Wikipedia critic. He doesn't know shit, and he whines like a little bitch. For pointing that out, it was I who was muted. I wonder if he can only really manage to get through the day, especially when posting shit like this, by pretending I just don't exist, that people can't find us and see them for what they are, using fact based analysis. It seems to be the strategy of all these cowards. They really should see a therapist, they'll happily tell them it is not a viable coping strategy. Rather hilariously, Jake keeps inadvertently reminding them who they really are, in his own sad attempt to retcon a justification for why we are here and they are there.


Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:36 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm
Posts: 1401
Reply with quote
Poetlister@Wikipediocracy wrote:
If the WMF or WMUK were serious about ensuring adequate representation, they would of course get experienced editors, preferably admins, to assist people like Jessica Wade. That would have to include monitoring AfD and ensuring that articles were defended.
Classic throwaway comment from this idiot. Clearly hasn't thought it through at all.

It wouldn't be so bad, if he hadn't just yesterday been flapping his gums about how Wikipediocracy "should be aiming for fact-based analysis". There's no facts or analysis that can turn this vacuous horseshit into something that doesn't induce laughter for those who know what they're talking about, and much wasted time for those who don't.

Embarassing. The guy is a fucking useless moron, someone who just types for the sake of it. If he continues to be protected from this reality by the Wikipediocracy management, he will only get worse. If that is even possible.


Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:40 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 75 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group ColorizeIt.
Designed by ST Software.