WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
User avatar
Strelnikov
Sucks Admin
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:25 pm
Has thanked: 484 times
Been thanked: 295 times

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by Strelnikov » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:23 am

Serbia was a wreck after the Yugoslav wars, all of the combatant states are still putting themselves back together in the countryside where all the burned out farms and smashed-up villages are. So the internet is issue number 999 out of 1000.
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.

User avatar
Graaf Statler
Side Troll
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 4:20 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by Graaf Statler » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:35 am

Poor plan. Serbia is in the running for a European Union membership from 2009 on, and I am sure they don't want to blow it by hosting Wikipedia.
No, I have a better idea. North Korea
Fits exact in there philosophy, Kim and Donald have a excellent relation, so there is a American touch, no copyright problems, stable regime, easy to find "volunteers", a good climate, and beautiful beaches. It is the perfect candidate!

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by CrowsNest » Thu Jul 05, 2018 6:55 pm

Canada had a relevant court case recently, did they not? Can't remember what it was now, but I don't think it was good for Teh Wiki.

They also don't really like internet bullying. Drmies would be screwed.

User avatar
Kumioko
Sucks Mod
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by Kumioko » Sat Jul 07, 2018 8:45 pm

The End wrote:Meanwhile in California, Section 230 is still an effective shield. I'm curious if the appeal (which I assume goes to the federal courts now) will eventually move up to the U.S. Supreme Court?

https://www.theverge.com/2018/7/3/17530 ... california

That's true, but some of the servers are in Virginia, where the rules are different and depending on the state, they could still go after the editor making the edit, which could put the WMF in a position to either help the editor and potentially be associated to the case or show the community they won't help them. Either way, they could be in trouble.
#BbbGate

User avatar
The End
Sucks Fan
Posts: 245
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2017 7:45 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by The End » Sat Jul 07, 2018 10:53 pm

Does it matter where the servers are or where the company/organization is located? I suppose it would be legally possible if the WMF just moved it's servers around the world as needed. It would be very expensive, though.
"In the long run, volunteers are the most expensive workers you'll ever have." -Red Green

"I am a dark bouquet of neuroses..."
- Jerry Holkins, Penny Arcade

User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: WMF worries about "intermediary liability"

Post by CrowsNest » Sun Jul 08, 2018 4:05 pm

Jimmy thinks Wikipedia could survive even if it were outlawed. He's always been a bit of a fantasist. This is why I was so worried about a Wikipedia on a blockchain, but thankfully Jimmy doesn't seem to appreciate the upsides of that approach.

Post Reply