I assume he meant to write "prompting a very on-point observation of the similarity of the current situation to the Gamergate situation from The Chairwoman of the Board Of Trustees" there, but regardless, for him to point the finger at anyone else about sexism and/or "pursuing" women in this context is the height of hypocrisy. They should definitely clean up their act A LOT before spouting stuff like that.
Besides, it's not like we haven't "targeted" Fae, Gamaliel, or even BU Rob13 here in the past. We already know very well what those guys are like, and there's no need to repeat what we already know. There are search engines for that, and in any event, it's just not credible that any of them precipitated this whole fiasco to anywhere near the same extent - they were never even "harassed" by any rational standard. But of course, Mr. Nest is the same guy who thinks Jessica Wade is some sort of Devil Woman, and my guess would be that he can't bring himself to criticize Ms. Hale because that might somehow distract people from his ridiculous, incomprehensible Wade-bashing.
Excuse me? I have been sexist when, exactly? I target Wade for very good reasons, which I have detailed at length. My reply to your analysis of her work has been on this board a while, to no apparent effect on your outlook on the wikiworld. My guess is your silence means I was right, you hadn't properly done your research, you merely slapped some half assed crap together in the hopes you could pin something on me about being a sexist or whatever. It's laughable.
I'd have been totally fine with highlighting Hale alongside Wade, as I've been trying to get you planks to appreciate, the similarities are striking, if everything you've said about Hale and gender activism and victimhood stacks up. It is your lack of interest in Wade, a more apt target in many ways, that is the real head scratcher for serious critics not interested in simply going after women because it is what certain guys do when looking for someone to blame for a man's troubles. But now, I frankly don't want people thinking we're in this together, and casual readers who can't tell the differences in our approach might make that mistake.
Like I told you, the likes of Fae, Gamaliel and Rob quite happily throw themselves into the firing line. You get no credit for freely engaging them. Easy targets. There's plenty of other men involved in the Fram controversy, powerful Wikipedia men, all likely suspects as one of the many complainants, who are not so bold and brash when it comes to facing down their critics. You've been entirely uninterested in them. I'm open to reasons that better explain it beyond what it looks like, but if you've got none, then you've got none. I gotta call it how it looks, otherwise people would think bad of me. We exist to highlight how you suck, and on the whole women thing, boy do you people suck hard.
You're not the first to accuse me of sexism for my Wade expose, and I suspect you're just going to do what that other ill prepared critic did - realize you've made a lazy error, and wind your damn neck in. I mean, you can keep coming if you want, but I can defend it all day long. I'm owed a reply from you on it already, FFS. Can you deal
, is the issue? History says no. You want no part of this really, too much like serious criticism. You've not got the time or the interest.