
What an ass.09:53, 21 September 2019 diff hist -4 Blind Faith rvv - HELLO ANY ANTI VANDALISM EDITORS HERE?
Anyway, to be clear, this is supposedly the non-crazy Ritchie, right? The one not experiencing random anger due to personal issues?
What an ass.09:53, 21 September 2019 diff hist -4 Blind Faith rvv - HELLO ANY ANTI VANDALISM EDITORS HERE?
JuiceBeetle wrote:I wish you were adding links to these:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blind_Faith&diff=prev&oldid=916918364
Lol, that's an "emotional" (childish, unprofessional) edit comment. Harmless, though.
Can never actually do anything just because it's the right thing to do, or policy says it, it always has to have a personal dimension for him.a good friend of mine who has only recently come out got attacked last week so if I spot any homophobic abuse on Wikipedia I am currently in the mood to kick the perpetrators up the arse and tell them to not let the door hit them on the way out. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Looks like Ritchie has another harassment target in his sights.
....which was hardly news to actual critics, but of course all he achieved was an already globally banned user being reported to the WMF for socking around their global ban, and nobody needs that stress, least of all a banned user clearly possessing a thin grip on her mental health.No sockpuppetry case page, no details on the block. Usual Bbb23 (T-C-L) policy, it would seem.
Nice.There is a moral panic over COI / paid editing at Wikipedia, which is propogated by Jimbo downwards. People don't look at the content or the edits, they just shout "ZOMG PAID EDITING" with all the critical thinking skills of a Sun reader.