The latest sock, the wise and handsome Emperor Morgan, had a few issues with Wikipedia it seems, and set straight to work, lighting them up.
1. The way Wikipedia editors spoke about the disappearance of Cleo Smith is disgusting
2. They way Wikipedia is seeking to hide their obvious intent to harm Richard Desmond for typically left wing morally bankrupt reasons, is clear and obvious
2. The way Wikipedia continues to ignore what Philip Cross is, is corrupt.
Not to tell them their chosen hobbies, but this all seems like stuff that bona fide Wikipedia critics hanging out in the world's preeminent Wikipedia investigation forum would want to expose, not bury.
For as we might expect, after what appears to be yet another illegal use of the CheckUser tool, Emperor Morgan has been tagged and bagged, their posts removed from view.
A great outcome for Wikipedia. A not so great outcome for the victims of Wikipedia.
But hey, anything that further proves Jake is taking the golden coin, is fine by me.
You feeling all right Jake?
Am I still making you look good?
An unexpected added bonus, was the sight of HighInBC doing what I had perhaps thought are long deprecated aspects of Jack booted Nazi thuggery masquerading as good self governance. Interrogation, acting as judge and jury, acting as if the word of your brother officer is unquestionable, and finally gagging your victim so others can't hear what you have done. And the taunting. Oh, the taunting. Sick puppy.
Yes, all the ingredients of true and proper corruption, unassailable power. I thought Wikipedia had moved passed this. I thought they had for some time now, appreciated the benefits to the community of its trusted actors being seen to actually be checking each other's work and holding each other to account, even if they feel like it's just boring paperwork. So tedious I guess, when you have all the power and your targets have none.
After all, Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. It's not a great many things. One of the many activities of King Brian appears to be to educate the Wikishits and their victims alike, as to their true reality. That if it is convenient, such as to save the cult being embarrassed or shamed into doing the right thing, well, shit, you can be banned from Wikipedia for any reason, including no reason at all.
That's legit their official stance. Some serious suits came up with that half forgotten aspect of the Terms (used to be common knowledge back when I was coming up as a novice critic, but the 'hood ain't what it used to be, post gentrification).
And fuck me don't you feel like a stupid bastard if this is the first time you've heard about this formerly theoretical but now bona fide legal precedent that underpins the cult? Don't feel bad.
Naturally, Wikipediocracy don't shout about it because, well, they were rather rooting for the wrong side on that one. Something about the crimes of the one outweighing the needs of the many, or some daft shit that you'd only find in a really crap made for TV movie.
Ssshhh! I think they think they got away with it!
Fun times Jake.
I mean, shit, who are we to say HighInBC isn't a sock of Zzzuzz? Nobody knew Eostrix was a sock of Icewhiz, and fuck me if the CheckUsers are quite adamant they want no part of making that case. I wonder why. Not.
Have we not learnt that CheckUser is rather a silly thing? That it catches only those those want to be caught, and there is likely HTD paydirt in being caught in a certain way.
Gotta build a case after all. Why have one case of a cop shooting a black man in cold blood, when you can present fifty? And then point to who is really pulling the trigger and why.
We can leave the collection of necessary materials the cult considers confidential, to Eostrix II. All be it, that is probably more correctly written as Eostrix -1: The Before Times.
The Fun Times.
Shit, who but a bunch of quisling bastards would ever be so daft as to let outsiders think even for a second, that they were all about the hunt for owls and their fanciers? To be clear, I'm asking why Wikipediocracy of all people, would be seen to be helping hunt down Eostrix.
I kid of course, Smiley has already said, and so convincingly of course, it's not for any moral reason, which perhaps might have made sense, if you seriously believe the claims of Wikipedia editors regarding their enemies.
It's because he finds it fun, and he doesn't even care if he is right or not.
Uh huh.
Wikipediocracy brand Fun Fun Fun, eh Jake?
Correct the record, and fast, that's what I would do. But that's just me. Careful about who has justifiable cause to doubt my loyalties or core beliefs. Who knows. One of these days I might really need someone to really believe I am a serious critic.
A litigious billionaire, perhaps. I'd be a fool to throw that away just because I was desperate for Beeblebrox to know that I too find certain things "gross" in some desperate bid to make friends on the internet. Not that I do, me being all about inclusivity, as anyone can see. You can't fake brand values, people.
Some try. They fail. We point. We laugh. We amuse ourselves with their absurd counter attacks. Which reminds me, I'll have to wrap this up now, I have a meeting with my incel buddies tonight, and I must prepare my slides!
Fun times, Jake.
But hey, this is me, forgetting thet I'm talking to Jake's crew. What would they be interested in the finer arts of how a brave and noble warrior might go about catching Wikipedia functionaries not just doing illegal shit, but doing it in a way that appears systemic and institutional?
Of course, I totally understand, in their position, they would hardly want people to know that such things are only possible with the help of corrupt individuals like Beeblebrox, who stand aside and either tacitly endorse or otherwise don't check the activities people like Zzzuzz or TNT as they go about sniffing people's private areas and falsifying the justifications in official, court obtainable logs.
People would ask questions. Questions like, why the fuck are the alleged enemies of Wikipedia cosying up to the very people whose rank immorality is what sustains and protects Wikipedia from all threats, foreign and domestic?
What you trying to pull, they would say.
Got an answer yet Jake?
Feeling good yet, Jake?
1/3
