... On average, more than 4,000 people visit Andrew Jackson’s page a day, and more than 6,000 take a look at Thomas Jefferson’s. Wikipedia is increasingly viewed as a legitimate source of information, and it can affect legislative and judicial decisions. The latter is crucial right now, given very real attacks on Native American sovereignty in U.S. courts.
Disregard and outright contempt for Native American peoples, history, and knowledge on Wikipedia, in the courts, and in the media is not new. Erasing Native existence was common practice in 19th- and 20th-century New England newspapers, for example. And the United States and Canada have been trying to legislate Native peoples out of existence since the outset of colonization. As the historian Patrick Wolfe explained, “Settler colonialism destroys to replace,” or at
Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
-
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 550
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
https://slate.com/technology/2023/02/wi ... alism.html
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 722 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
- Contact:
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
heh the subtitle is "Native editors are fighting back."Ognistysztorm wrote: ↑Fri Feb 03, 2023 9:33 pmhttps://slate.com/technology/2023/02/wi ... alism.html
... On average, more than 4,000 people visit Andrew Jackson’s page a day, and more than 6,000 take a look at Thomas Jefferson’s. Wikipedia is increasingly viewed as a legitimate source of information, and it can affect legislative and judicial decisions. The latter is crucial right now, given very real attacks on Native American sovereignty in U.S. courts.
Disregard and outright contempt for Native American peoples, history, and knowledge on Wikipedia, in the courts, and in the media is not new. Erasing Native existence was common practice in 19th- and 20th-century New England newspapers, for example. And the United States and Canada have been trying to legislate Native peoples out of existence since the outset of colonization. As the historian Patrick Wolfe explained, “Settler colonialism destroys to replace,” or at
i predict nothing will come of their efforts, except maybe some lolz if some rogue admin decides Native Americans have a conflict of interest when "fighting back", i.e. editing articles related to American Indians.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1475 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
Already on ANI: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ive_Tribes
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 2115 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
Yeah, that's a doomed attempt....Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 5:57 pmAlready on ANI: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ive_Tribes
Too bad the tribes can't just block WP, and get publicity for it:
https://www.engadget.com/pakistan-block ... 27009.html
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 179 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
Personally I'm pretty surprised by this article. Not because it surprises me about the content but because Slate published it. Slate usually only does puff pieces about Wikipedia. Its rare for them to do actual critical journalism when it comes to Wikipedia.
#BbbGate
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 2115 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
Three days later, the Pakistani government walked it back......probably because so many people screamed "WHY CAN'T WE LOOK UP TRIVIA ON WIKIPEDIA?!?!?"
"The "unintended consequences of this blanket ban" outweighed the "benefits.""
https://www.engadget.com/pakistan-wikip ... 26810.html
"The "unintended consequences of this blanket ban" outweighed the "benefits.""
https://www.engadget.com/pakistan-wikip ... 26810.html
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
I'd have assumed someone made an argument as to its educational value, maybe medical or science articles.ericbarbour wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:19 pmThree days later, the Pakistani government walked it back......probably because so many people screamed "WHY CAN'T WE LOOK UP TRIVIA ON WIKIPEDIA?!?!?"
"The "unintended consequences of this blanket ban" outweighed the "benefits.""
https://www.engadget.com/pakistan-wikip ... 26810.html
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1475 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
Here's an old Slate article that is critical of Wikipedia. It appears to about CIA nonsense though, so I'm not reading all of it.Kumioko wrote: ↑Mon Feb 06, 2023 12:43 pmPersonally I'm pretty surprised by this article. Not because it surprises me about the content but because Slate published it. Slate usually only does puff pieces about Wikipedia. Its rare for them to do actual critical journalism when it comes to Wikipedia.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1475 times
- Been thanked: 300 times
Re: Slate piece "How Wikipedia Erases Indigenous History"
BOOMERANG'd mere hours after my original post.ericbarbour wrote: ↑Sun Feb 05, 2023 12:13 amYeah, that's a doomed attempt....Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Sat Feb 04, 2023 5:57 pmAlready on ANI: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ive_Tribes
Too bad the tribes can't just block WP, and get publicity for it:
https://www.engadget.com/pakistan-block ... 27009.html
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.