https://redditmetis.com
A lot of wikipedians use reddit a lot. Put their reddit username in there and you can see what's swimming in their head!
this was mine, might run some people on Wikipedia subs

A histogram would probably be easier to read and interpret. If you have a decent sample to compute the histograms from (easily collected using a script that traverses a user's contribs), it might even be possible to detect sock-puppets with a simple bag-of-words model.Wordcloud
wuts ur reddit accountArcher wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:22 amA histogram would probably be easier to read and interpret. If you have a decent sample to compute the histograms from (easily collected using a script that traverses a user's contribs), it might even be possible to detect sock-puppets with a simple bag-of-words model.Wordcloud
I have a few but I've only posted a few times on each and they'd not provide a representative histogram. I dislike the site because it's designed and structured to facilitate censorship as well as advertising. It likely also displaces other venues that are actually usable. Many times if people don't like what you have to say, you'll fall below the minimum "karma" required to post. It's not a site that you can use for serious discussion.journo wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 4:30 pmwuts ur reddit accountArcher wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:22 amA histogram would probably be easier to read and interpret. If you have a decent sample to compute the histograms from (easily collected using a script that traverses a user's contribs), it might even be possible to detect sock-puppets with a simple bag-of-words model.Wordcloud