Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

Good, bad, biased, paid or what-have-you. There's an endless supply.
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5235
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1419 times
Been thanked: 2181 times

Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

Post by ericbarbour » Fri May 09, 2025 7:14 pm

Twenty-five years into the great Wiki-Babble experiment and I still routinely see corporate articles that were clearly paid-edited and not declared (and lacking in references). Free advertising. Paid for indirectly by the fools who donate to the WMF.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barco_(manufacturer)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... Carlos0253
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:C ... ons/Writie


User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5235
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1419 times
Been thanked: 2181 times

Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Jun 02, 2025 12:30 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Hobert

Never heard of her. The vast bulk of this article (created 2 weeks ago) was written by two "apparently different" people in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Launchballer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meena

Would not shock me if this was Audrey herself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1290942693

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5235
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1419 times
Been thanked: 2181 times

Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Jul 08, 2025 11:14 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Araw
VERY obscure experimental musician.

Major contributor: Roosterjack, who has edited almost nothing else on en-wiki. And all last year.

The only other major contributor, Michig, has a contribution history that makes me wonder if he used to be an Oracle employee. He claims to be a winner of an Erasmus Prize, which is rich, since there have been very few winners of it--including the "Wikipedia community" in 2015. Thus you could make the comical claim that millions of Wp editors deserve a share of the prize, including abusive vandals like Grawp and Willy On Wheels.

User avatar
Strelnikov
Sucks Admin
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:25 pm
Has thanked: 500 times
Been thanked: 298 times

Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

Post by Strelnikov » Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:51 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Mon Jun 02, 2025 12:30 am
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audrey_Hobert

Never heard of her. The vast bulk of this article (created 2 weeks ago) was written by two "apparently different" people in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Launchballer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meena

Would not shock me if this was Audrey herself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1290942693
The goobers who edit Wikipedia probably think Audrey Hobert is notable because she wrote for a Loud House sequel series (whoop-de-doo) that was live action and that her father was a TV writer. The whole stub BLP looks like the creation of bona fides by an music agent so that Hobert could get gigs at music festivals because she doesn't have an album yet, and she is probably facing criticism from the crowds for being a "studio plant" (unlike in the glory days of the singer-songwriter, writing for other people before you are established is some sort of crime to the Spotify crowd.) Yes, doing what even Lou Reed did in 1964 is a fakery of the highest order.


Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.

Post Reply