Crap or questionable articles

Good, bad, biased, paid or what-have-you. There's an endless supply.
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1411 times
Been thanked: 2153 times

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Post by ericbarbour » Wed Jun 04, 2025 6:39 am

Spot the difference (and then tell us why in the hell there are 2 repetitive articles basically about the same mountain)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_(mountain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Peak

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5205
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1411 times
Been thanked: 2153 times

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Post by ericbarbour » Fri Jun 13, 2025 4:04 am

The opening "summary" paragraphs of Sprint Corporation are a shredded mess. The "History" below it isn't much better.

Wiki-Slobber. And even though Sprint no longer exists, there are many signs of paid editing in the history. This is a good reason why nobody fixes bad corporate articles.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Fri Jun 13, 2025 4:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply