Crap or questionable articles

Good, bad, biased, paid or what-have-you. There's an endless supply.

Moderator: Abd

Crap or questionable articles

Postby ericbarbour » Fri Feb 24, 2017 7:03 pm

Posted before but restarting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumpster

Something any "reference encyclopedia" should have. But it's a sad little near-stub: only about 5k bytes and created in 2007.

On the other hand, there is this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumpster_diving

One of Wikipedia's oldest articles, dating from 2001. Cuerrently more than 43k bytes long. Why do Wikipedians think dumpster diving is more important that the dumpster one dives into? Is there any kind of sane explanation for this?
#BbbGate
User avatar
ericbarbour
Psyop
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Location: #Bbb23

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby ericbarbour » Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:54 pm

This is such VALUABLE INFORMATION!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_S
#BbbGate
User avatar
ericbarbour
Psyop
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Location: #Bbb23

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby Strelnikov » Mon Feb 27, 2017 12:27 am

They had the moxie to put a "original research" tag on this one!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_skateboard
Still "Globally Banned" on Wikipedia for the high crime of journalism.
User avatar
Strelnikov
Psyop
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 3:25 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby Soham321 » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:48 pm

.
Last edited by Soham321 on Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Soham321
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:14 am

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby ericbarbour » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:14 pm

The next time some Wiki-Fool wants to berate you about "proper referencing", show him this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_V8_engine
#BbbGate
User avatar
ericbarbour
Psyop
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Location: #Bbb23

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby Kato » Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:51 pm

Soham321 wrote:WP article of a well known and well connected Indian lobbyist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suhel_Seth
This doesn't belong here, it has been a balanced article since September 2016, and after Soham321's socking ultimately resulted in an indeff with WMF also approving secret suppression of Soham321's crap. The user Mannerheimo is a long term paid editor available for hire.
User avatar
Kato
Banned_Troll
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:51 am

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby ericbarbour » Mon Apr 03, 2017 1:27 am

Why is there misinfo on WP? At least a few items can be blamed on Cris Shapan:

http://dangerousminds.net/comments/ever ... t_for_this

With your Photoshop skills you can “edit” the past—in a very Orwellian sense—and it’s frightening to see how fucking gullible people can be. I recall we posted one of your Alan Hale parody album covers and idiots on Facebook were commenting “I used to have this record!” “Me too!” and “I still have mine!” Ummm… no you don’t.

Cris Shapan: Yeah, it’s scary to see something I did purely to entertain friends become someone else’s reality. Some claim to remember or even own something that never existed. Others will repost a parody ad as real, especially if it reinforces some agenda they’re touting (sexism in advertising, the past was a horrible place, frankenfood, etc.). People read the fake ad copy and leap to the wildest interpretations, often expressing outrage at something that never actually happened. It’s just bizarre. Some people are so convinced these parody pieces are genuine that they’ve gone in and modified Wikipedia pages to reflect their existence, which of course compounds the stupidity.
#BbbGate
User avatar
ericbarbour
Psyop
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Location: #Bbb23

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby suckadmin » Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:10 am

This is a proverbial crap article.. :lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariko_Aoki_phenomenon
For registration problems email admin AT wikipediasucks DOT co
User avatar
suckadmin
Psyop
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 6:56 am

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby Flip Flopped » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:35 am

suckadmin wrote:This is a proverbial crap article.. :lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariko_Aoki_phenomenon
Indeed. :P

That article has been extensive edited for a year by User:Leaf of knowledge who seems to have only made four edits to other articles.

Drmies and Lady of Shallot touched the article earlier in its history, with Drmies having done more than Lady of Shallot. The article survived a AfD in 2014.
User avatar
Flip Flopped
Modsquad
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:38 pm

Re: Crap or questionable articles

Postby ericbarbour » Thu Apr 13, 2017 1:53 pm

A perfect, IDEAL example of Wikipedians acting like ADHD robot people. A long-and-still-growing article about a trivial news item.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Ex ... 1_incident

Created on 10 April. Three days later it was 49k bytes with 92 references.

And in six months it will probably be totally forgotten.
#BbbGate
User avatar
ericbarbour
Psyop
 
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:56 pm
Location: #Bbb23

Next

Return to Content Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests