Anroth

[Graaf Statler]

They don't come much uglier than Only in death / Anroth.

He lives in the UK, by the way.

Is the avatar you are using where they made a problem out Guido? With that two girls? They are crazy, it's a complete innocent picture. I really don't understand why it could be any problem, and why it's not allowed on WO. It's sick minded.

[CrowsNest]

So Zoloft, I will ask you again, since you have recently posted here. Is this ignorant Wikipedian prick one of the people you respect? Is he one of the people you were acting for, when you banned me? Don't be a coward and dodge the question..

Waiting.........still waiting........

Selective mutism. Much like NewYorkBrad. That prick recently said this on Zoloft's safe space...

These days I post quite infrequently, when I have a specific point to make or when I'm asked a question.

He sure as hell didn't reply to me when I asked him a question. And Uncle Zoloft did fuck all to make him feel like that was a bad thing, like he was disrespectful or not contributing to Wikipediocracy in the spirit of its mission.

The post was only partly accurate - because of Uncle Zoloft's general weaknesses, Brad and other notorious Wikipedians have indeed developed a taste for only swanning in to Wikipediocracy when they want to make some bullshit declaration of the truth according to them.

[Graaf Statler]

You have to understand Wikipedia is a form of a sekt. Most users believe in a better world, a world with a kind of a global Wikipedian gouvernement. A better world, a equal world, with changes for everybody, and that is the reason most Wikipedians accept all the wikishit. Something like shit happens, something revolutionairs, something to replace the old far from perfect systems out of the time before the internet and they are willing to pay the price to reach there goals.

But the mouvment has failed. The mouvement didn't manage to crate a legal base in Europe, Wikimedia for instance in Holland never found a direction and is drowned in dreams and extremism like for instance that porn base feminism. WMF is a chaos, a job factory and a snake pit, and not a noble foundation what is supporting in a proper way community's.

But the money keeps flowing in. And because of that I think users don't want to give up there dreams, there sekt, have the illusion it is possible to fix the Wiki mouvement.
And you and me are the enemy. Because you and me keep on saying the mouvement is far beyond repair, you have to start over. And that is what they don't want hear!

They want to go one with it, and have the illusion the problems will be fixed one day. But they don't have any plan or direction, or any idea how they want to reach there goal. because there is non, because nobody can fix Wikipedia or the wiki mouvement. Deep inside they know it, because so many people gave so many arguments for that. So, there only answer is a block and trolling. Because there is no answer!

They can only behave themself as sekt members to keep there mouvement running, otherwise it is finished. It's there only way to try to survive, hoping for better times.
Put cheerleader Maher on a stage and there we go again and the money is flowing in! Go, go, go, we are the fact checkers of the world. Based on nothing, but it works till now! And the sekt members believe it and like it. It is what they want to hear, it's pep talk, it is keeping the money machine running.

And don't forget many of them have a social problem. Obesitas, autism, and other probelms and the wiki mouvement has become there new live.There they are accepted. There they have there meetings. there Wikimania, there most times useless projects, and if the wiki mouvment collaps, they are also losing this important part of there life.
They simply don't want to hear what you and I have to say, and that is the reason they block us.

[CrowsNest]

Well said Graf. They are wilfully deaf, they do not accept reality, what they tell the outside word is nothing short of propaganda, and this is why I have no doubt the entire thing is doomed to fail. We are merely doing our best to hasten the day. If Wikipediocracy wasn't so shit, if Uncle Zoloft wasn't such a blind fool, it could have already failed by now.

[CrowsNest]

More Anroth bullshit. It never stops.

https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 3741#p3741

[Graaf Statler]

Fun, a dyed in the wool Wikipediot. Well, fora are nice place to learn to write proper English for a uneducated Dutch farmer....... (don't get me wrong, I am not a farmer, I am a handscraftman.)

But how true, I think the Wikipediocracy members have kept too long the dream alive there was a possibility to save the wiki mouvement, and have become in that way slowly, even without knowing it themself, a extension of WMF. Because now it has nothing to do with a critical forum anymore.
It's a complete wikipedia and WMF propaganda forum at the moment, with cheerleaders as Anroth and the rest in the first position.
Mabey they are using there old critical image in the hope someone is reading there and believe them, I don't know. But in general it's the tried and tested old Wikishit they are posing there nowadays.

[CrowsNest]

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 89#p217489

The mind boggles as to why Jake even bothers to make posts like this. I know he's smart enough to know Anroth likely knew what Guido meant and chose not to respond in a way that acknowledged it, in favour of giving a classically arrogant game-playing fuck-you-pig style Wikipedian response (bearing in mind we already know Anroth thinks Guido is a kiddie fiddler, so the whole idea he's now engaging him in good faith is pretty ridiculous). What is it for? Who does it help? Who is benefiting from being reminded yet again that if you take a Wikipedian out of Wikipedia, especially this Wikipedian, he still gonna act like a Wikipedian. Especially if you let him. The real tragedy here would be if Jake is just doing this because he's got five minutes to kill. It's the only logical reason though.

[CrowsNest]

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 19#p217519

You dont have the right to free speech, so when you personally have a go at someone in a venue that has a 'friendly space' policy, expect them to enforce it.

I suggest you take a holiday and learn how to criticise something without attacking the person.

This is Anroth at his Wikipediot finest. You wouldn't believe this is the same guy who does the sort of low-rent shit documented in this thread.

This is why Wikipediocracy died. Why would you travel to a venue that claims to be independent of Wikipedia, when the only people you find there, are the exact same assholes you're trying to escape from, and expose for what they are.

And on top of that, you find out they're hiding who they are, talking about their Wikipedia accounts in the third person as if they're endorsing their own actions as a neutral observer, and the staff, who know exactly who he is, just stand by and do nothing, as if their right to deceive you is more important than your right to know who you're talking to.

The person Anroth is talking to, is a one of the few people to have actually joined Wikipediocracy in the last few years. Way to go Zoloft. Great culture you got going there. Shame it doesn't actually achieve anything. Maybe Anroth can write you a blog post, or even start a halfway decent thread that is thought provoking and drives debate. He hasn't even started a thread since July 2016.....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/search. ... mit=Search

Or maybe he'll just carry on being what he is, a piece of shit Wikipediot doing his piece of shit thing, and you'll accept it, because it maintains the illusion that the site isn't totally dead. It's dead where it matters - inside. You go no soul, no purpose, no reason to exist at all. A perfect fit for the Anroth's of this world.

[Graaf Statler]

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=217519#p217519

You dont have the right to free speech, so when you personally have a go at someone in a venue that has a 'friendly space' policy, expect them to enforce it.

I suggest you take a holiday and learn how to criticise something without attacking the person.

This is Anroth at his Wikipediot finest. You wouldn't believe this is the same guy who does the sort of low-rent shit documented in this thread.

This is why Wikipediocracy died. Why would you travel to a venue that claims to be independent of Wikipedia, when the only people you find there, are the exact same assholes you're trying to escape from, and expose for what they are.

Why for the fuck is Zoloft giving this idiot a podium? You don't have the right to free speech, who for the hell is mister Anroth to claim this? But Erika was complete naive too, and was far to deep in that wikishit, and yes, now she is disapointed. Because that complete wiki-gender bull is only something wiki political, it is not real, it's extreme.

But in general I have the idea there are problems in wiki paradise, because what we see now is high rank wikipedians who are starting to fight in public. Because it is absolute clear that guy Anroth is a wiki believer.
Before he was already quoting parts of the complet insane Dutch abitroll messages and telling me how fair that SanFanBan was, so it looks to me he absolute someone from inside the system. The only question what remains is what is he doing on a side what is claiming to be critical, and why is he tolerated there.

Zoloft, can we get a explanation? We are still waiting for it.

[AndrewForson]

This whole "free speech" thing is depressing. What Anroth means is that Erika is not free to say anything that upsets him, but he is free to say things that upset Erika. In short, he is a bully.