Kupdung

Editors, Admins and Bureaucrats Oh my!

Re: Kupdung

Postby Dysklyver » Sun Aug 26, 2018 10:53 am

AndrewForson wrote:It's called gaslighting, and it's a popular tactic on some parts of the internet. Simply deny what is blatantly true, even in the teeth of evidence on the same screen as your denial. It's astonishingly hard to believe that someone is telling barefaced lies and so the reader tends to rationalise it away: cognitive dissonance kicks in, and readers process the contradiction in terms of who they believe rather than what they can see.

It is a technique for consolidating and increasing the user's power and influence. There's a handy popular description here.


Clever.
De facto globally banned on all Wikimedia sites. Editor of The Wiki Cabal. find me on the Wiki Treehouse Discord.
User avatar
Dysklyver
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:14 am

Re: Kupdung

Postby CrowsNest » Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:08 pm

He does meet an awful lot of those checklist points, in general.

He doesn't match point one though, not for these mistatements. We can't know why he is lying, if it isn't a case of him just not remembering what he says from one day to the next, but we sure do know he is not doing it so people grow to distrust everything he says. If ever a man wanted the whole world to believe what he says, it is this nerk*.

*-not a mispelling, see the urban dictionary of confused
User avatar
CrowsNest
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Kupdung

Postby AndrewForson » Fri Aug 31, 2018 6:59 am

I have a confession to make.

I am Kudpung.

Well, no, actually, I'm not. But I wish I had managed to inflict half as much damage on the project as he has. Aside from discouraging productive contributors and driving traffic to critical sites (which he has never visited, oh dear me no), he has managed to sink the Signpost and in doing so embroil Gorilla Warfare and Fram in a three-way dispute that with any luck will end with them all leaving in a huff.

เร่งวัน!
User avatar
AndrewForson
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:56 pm

Re: Kupdung

Postby Dysklyver » Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:10 pm

AndrewForson wrote:I have a confession to make.

I am Kudpung.

Well, no, actually, I'm not. But I wish I had managed to inflict half as much damage on the project as he has. Aside from discouraging productive contributors and driving traffic to critical sites (which he has never visited, oh dear me no), he has managed to sink the Signpost and in doing so embroil Gorilla Warfare and Fram in a three-way dispute that with any luck will end with them all leaving in a huff.

เร่งวัน!


Lol this is so true, by somehow engineering the perfect storm of crap, he will inadvertently cause major problems that I am pretty sure he was trying to avoid.
De facto globally banned on all Wikimedia sites. Editor of The Wiki Cabal. find me on the Wiki Treehouse Discord.
User avatar
Dysklyver
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:14 am

Re: Kupdung

Postby CrowsNest » Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:22 am

Genuine plea for sympathy, or just a sad attempt to pull heart strings?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =857267576

Not a good look for Wikipedia either way. Not to mention nobody even replied. What a horrible place.
User avatar
CrowsNest
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Kupdung

Postby Dysklyver » Mon Sep 03, 2018 9:11 am

I wouldn't feel too sorry for Kudpung, I recently found out where he lives and I am pretty sure it's a nice enough retirement spot. I daresay it would do him some good to relax and enjoy the real world a bit.
De facto globally banned on all Wikimedia sites. Editor of The Wiki Cabal. find me on the Wiki Treehouse Discord.
User avatar
Dysklyver
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:14 am

Re: Kupdung

Postby Graaf Statler » Mon Sep 03, 2018 9:28 am

Dysklyver wrote:I wouldn't feel too sorry for Kudpung, I recently found out where he lives and I am pretty sure it's a nice enough retirement spot. I daresay it would do him some good to relax and enjoy the real world a bit.

Ah! you found the same page like I did. indeed a nice enough retirement spot, also to spot the gender difference. :mrgreen:
Not exacte a gender neutral place........
User avatar
Graaf Statler
 
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am

Re: Kupdung

Postby CrowsNest » Mon Oct 01, 2018 3:26 am

Buried in his awful comment on the first SignPost which he did not oversea, is yet another hint that Kupdung may not be the feminist he claims to be......
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =861941618
links to internal US politics of which the media is already saturated and of little or no interest to the rest of the English speaking world. Trump is international news but his judges are not.
I've no idea where he lives, but I can assure him the Kavanaugh controversy secured top billing on the BBC's prime time television news.

Not only did he get that wrong, he completely ignored the fact the piece he is complaining about did focus on how it was specifically impacting Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _the_media

Indeed, it completely ignored the alleged sexual assault angle, but maybe that's fine with Kupdung?
User avatar
CrowsNest
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Kupdung

Postby CrowsNest » Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:06 am

Wikipedia is not a joke site. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Your continued presence contradicts this claim. Yours, with love, the real hate site.

Genuinely bizarre that this stupid fuck thinks he would have anything to fear from Wikipediocracy. Black Kite is a beloved and protected member of Wikipediocracy, and he does stupid shit like this.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... =864511940

.....which gives a green light to Kupdung to continue to believe comments like this.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... ude_(angle)&diff=next&oldid=864462845

.....are an acceptable part of Wikipedia.

Now, it's pretty damn obvious the good folks of Wikipediocracy are incapable of, or unwilling to, explain to an asshole like Kupdung, from first principles, how and why his comment is so unnacceptable, but I can do it quite easily. It is obviously not a proof he needs to be shown, and it is not a proof that any experienced Wikipedian can really get away with claiming ignorance of. It isn't hard, I've done it many times before.

So, in the face of such proofs, presented on a critic site for all the Wikipedians to see, what else does he expect people to do in the absence of any effective Wikipedia process to stop him? It is inconceivable to me that Kupdung does not want to be hated. So that we do not to go Hell ourselves, we can only hate, and keep hating, until he dies. Which I think will be quite soon. And a good riddance it will be.

Let the good folks of Wikipediocracy explain what they will do. Send flowers most likely.
User avatar
CrowsNest
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 8:50 pm

Re: Kupdung

Postby Graaf Statler » Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:35 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I am really missing our Drmies in this Kudpung soap. It is insane! It is rediciles! Can't we make this to commercial succes by selling it as a soap, Crow? These guys are crazy, all! Complete crazy!
User avatar
Graaf Statler
 
Posts: 3787
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:20 am

PreviousNext

Return to Wikipedians

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron