You starter for ten.....
He's talking about the Reference Desks. Whassat?If we can't shut them down as blatant forums, indefinite protection is the next best thing. Every minute of admin/editor attention spent on disruption there is time that could be better spent writing an encyclopaedia. – Joe (talk) 21:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
So you get the idea there. Got promoted to the highest office on Wikipedia, but evidently hasn't even read the fucking manual, and is not possessing an ounce of good faith that others have.The Wikipedia reference desk works like a library reference desk. Ask a question here and Wikipedia volunteers will try to answer it.......We expect responses that not only answer the question, but are also factually correct, and to refrain from responding with answers that are based on guesswork. Ideally, answers should refer (link) to relevant Wikipedia articles, or otherwise cite reliable sources.......The reference desk process helps the growth and refinement of Wikipedia by identifying areas that may need improvement. If an article that could answer a question is lacking the relevant information, look for a way to work the information into the article. This provides a lasting value to the project.......The reference desk is not a chatroom, nor is it a soapbox for promoting individual opinions........The reference desk is not a place to debate controversial subjects.
Just another unqualified random fuckwit making decisions based on gut feel or personal opinion, someone for whom proof or evidence of their claims is immaterial, and who would rather make excuses for and otherwise accommodate the wishes of failing Administrators, than identify why they are not doing their goddamned jobs properly, so as to ensure maximum benefit is made of every good faith edit, from whoever or wherever it comes, assuming it comes in pursuance of the Manual.
Just fuck off and concentrate what you are qualified for. Which is supposedly archeology. And there was me thinking you needed exactly the traits of being good at reading and studying evidence, for that profession. Or does he see Wikipedia as a way to goof off? He certainly seems to think someone's nose should be pressed to the grindstone. Maybe not his though.
His Wikipedia mentors are Ritchie and Drmies. Like you couldn't have already guessed. At least we know he wasn't conceived biologically. We have to figure out how they are breeding though, before Civilisation itself is wiped out.