Kumioko wrote:Well I guess it's a good thing I don't consider you to be a real critic or that might bother me.
Is that meant to bother me? Seriously Kumioko, who do you think gives a rat's ass who you
think is a real critic? Name one person whose opinion of my critic credentials hangs on your endorsement? But by all meams, give us all a laugh while we wait, and explain how you came to that do conclusion? What does a real critic do? Show me an example of your best work. All I've seen recently at WO, is people falling over themselves to point out how much of an idiot you are, how you keep saying shit that is laughably innacurate, the product of someone who is quite unhinged, and nobody disagreeing.
Kumioko wrote:Aside from that I'm not really sure what I did to ruffle your feathers
I thought you said you read this forum?
Kumioko wrote:You're just pissed off and taking it out on me, which is fine really, but it's not really fooling anyone.
No, what doesn't fool people are idiotic replies like this. It reads like how a five year old reacts to criticism. It exudes that very victimhood which makes you such a hard person to consider a comrade.
I gave up on you long ago dude, there's just seemingly nothing between your ears. It is embarrassing when you claim to be a Wikipedia critic. They're not afraid of you dude, they don't cry when you evade their ban to do more useful editing, they laugh. The only principle you proved, is that on a website which runs on addiction, institutional banishment works. You proved that if someone is making a pain of themselves, then there is no downside to banning them. The yapping stops, while most of their useful contributions continue, because they are just that dumb
You literally don't see the position you are in, how much of a mug they've made out of you, and how it continues on WO, all under the noses and with the apparent blessing of so called critics. There have been times when you've said you get it, I'm sure you've even said you were done with editing, but you really don't, and you evidently aren't.
Just to remind you of one of the dumbest things you ever said, I am wondering why, now James Alexander is no longer at the WMF, your Global Ban has not been lifted. You were absolutely convinced it only existed because of Evil James. Well, what now? Does his Evilness extend to being able to influence the decisions of people he is no longer the boss of?
Come on, let's hear it, what stories have you told yourself to reconcile this plot hole in your victim narrative now?
I just noticed you couldn't wait (surprise) and we have already been told it......
I also doubt I will ever be unbanned because although they know that the ban is the thing that is causing the problem they won't lift it because creating drama creates jobs. If I was editing and improving the site, they can't argue for more money to keep me out. to create tools to keep me out and to help perpetuate the lie that I deserve to be banned.
What a bunch of absolute nonsense. They already have all the tools they need to keep "Kumioko" out, and keeping "Kumioko" out is causing nobody at the WMF a problem at all, except a few pestering emails I gather. Sad people who sneak back in to write articles, as if this is some great big punch on their nose, those people create jobs. Every job that hangs on Wikipedia being seen as a success, owes something to those dumbasses.